the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Transport of Biomass Burning Aerosol into the Extratropical Tropopause Region over Europe via Warm Conveyor Belt Uplift
Abstract. Aerosol particles in the extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (exUTLS) play a crucial role for the Earth‘s radiative budget. High temporal and spatial resolution measurements in the exUTLS are important to study mixing processes and their climate impact. Here, we present measurements from the TPEx mission (Tropopause composition gradients and mixing Experiment) an aircraft mission in June 2024 over Europe. The measurement platform, a Learjet 35A, was equipped with in-situ trace gas and aerosol measurements and filter samplers for offline analysis. For vertical gradient measurements of trace species and aerosol, we conducted redundant measurements on a fully automated towed sensor shuttle (TOSS) 200 m below the aircraft.
On 17 June 2024, we observed a streamer with elevated aerosol number concentration of up to 800 particles per cm3 between 100 nm and 1 μm. This is higher by a factor of two than the local background. Carbon monoxide (CO) mixing ratios were larger than 100 ppbv. Backward trajectories indicate that this pollution is transported from Canadian wildfires in the lower troposphere towards Europe, where it was uplifted on the edge of a warm conveyor belt into the tropopause region. There mixing with chemically stratospheric air occurred. The TOSS measurements also allow the calculation of the potential temperature gradient (∆θ · ∆z−1). We observed a change towards smaller gradients within the region of the polluted air masses, which is presumably due to an increase of θ at lower altitudes by radiative heating as a consequence of the transported refractory black carbon.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(23607 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(23607 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1346', Anonymous Referee #3, 19 Jun 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Thank you very much for the detailed reading, the detailed questions in order to improve our manuscript and the positive consideration of the topic for publication. Please find attached our answers and changes in the manuscript for the referee comment RC1.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1346', Anonymous Referee #4, 26 Jun 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Thank you very much for the detailed reading and the positive consideration of the topic for publication. We thank you for the comments in order to improve the manuscript. Please find attached our answers and changes in the manuscript for the referee comment RC2.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1346', Anonymous Referee #3, 19 Jun 2025
Dear all,
please find my comments in the attached file.
Best regards
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Thank you very much for the detailed reading, the detailed questions in order to improve our manuscript and the positive consideration of the topic for publication. Please find attached our answers and changes in the manuscript for the referee comment RC1.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1346', Anonymous Referee #4, 26 Jun 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Thank you very much for the detailed reading and the positive consideration of the topic for publication. We thank you for the comments in order to improve the manuscript. Please find attached our answers and changes in the manuscript for the referee comment RC2.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Philipp Joppe, 23 Jul 2025
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,121 | 114 | 24 | 1,259 | 35 | 50 |
- HTML: 1,121
- PDF: 114
- XML: 24
- Total: 1,259
- BibTeX: 35
- EndNote: 50
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Johannes Schneider
Jonas Wilsch
Heiko Bozem
Anna Breuninger
Joachim Curtius
Martin Ebert
Nicolas Emig
Peter Hoor
Sadath Ismayil
Konrad Kandler
Daniel Kunkel
Isabel Kurth
Hans-Christoph Lachnitt
Annette Miltenberger
Sarah Richter
Christian Rolf
Lisa Schneider
Cornelis Schwenk
Nicole Spelten
Alexander L. Vogel
Yafang Cheng
Stephan Borrmann
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(23607 KB) - Metadata XML
Dear all,
please find my comments in the attached file.
Best regards