the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Effect of grain-sorting waves on alternate bar dynamics: Implications of the breakdown of the hydrograph boundary layer
Abstract. Understanding the morphological responses of gravel-bed rivers to changes in external forces (e.g. water and sediment supply conditions) is a critical concern in river science and engineering. However, this remains a challenging issue because river responses are highly dependent on the distance from the source point where such environmental changes occur. Here, we focus on the short-term effects of flood-scale non-equilibrium sediment supply on the downstream alternate bar dynamics in poorly sorted gravel-bed rivers using a numerical morphodynamic model. Specifically, we perform a two-dimensional morphodynamic calculation using iRIC-Nays2DH in a straight channel under repeated cycles of an unsteady water hydrograph and a constant supply of poorly sorted sediment. Under the well-sorted sediment cases, the upstream non-equilibrium sediment supply can affect only a limited distance from the upstream end (i.e. the hydrograph boundary layer). However, the inclusion of a poorly sorted sediment disrupts this concept, leading to the migration of low-amplitude bedload sheets far downstream. In this context, the upstream water and sediment boundary conditions may affect the far-downstream river dynamics through the migration of bedload sheets. The numerical results show that the migration of bedload sheets and the associated fine sediment transport greatly affect the alternate bar dynamics and change their texture. However, this effect of bedload sheets on bars cannot propagate across the entire channel and disappears completely in the alternate bars located further downstream. These results suggest that the upstream non-equilibrium sediment supply condition in poorly sorted sediment has a non-negligible role in downstream alternate bar dynamics even far from the sediment feed point. However, this effect becomes negligible in the further downstream reaches as long as active and larger morphological changes, such as alternate bars, greatly disperse the bedload sheets.
- Preprint
(2259 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Chenge An, 26 Mar 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2025
This paper presents two-dimensional morphodynamic modeling simulations investigating how the so-called hydrograph boundary layer influences morphodynamics in straight channels with migrating alternate bars. This topic is a natural progression from prior work on hydrograph boundary layers, which have focused on the one-dimensional (bar-free) condition up until now. I therefore think this paper is relevant and of potential interest to the readers of Earth-Surface Dynamics.
The research presented in the paper is nicely conceived and generally well presented. There are some areas of the presentation and analysis that I find somewhat confusing, and I encourage the authors to consider the comments below in revision.
- More details on the specific set up of the model are needed. What are the initial conditions of the simulations? Was an initial equilibrium bed developed before imposing the hydrograph and constant sediment supply? What was the time step and cell size?
- The description of the calculation of sediment supply rates is also unclear (lines 285-290).
- For Fig 5 (and others) – is it possible to provide movie files of the simulation results as supplemental information? It would be informative to be able to see the evolution of these simulations as they occur.
- Can you provide more description of how the bars emerged? No mention is made of any initial topographic instability, so what led to bar emergence and why at 3km?
- Figure 8: what is “upper low” and “lower low”?
- Figure 13 is somewhat challenging to understand. What does the hysteresis look further upstream (within the HBL)? I wonder if also showing the hysteresis of bed elevation deviation, and/or average surface geometric mean grain size, at the locations chosen for Figure 13 would more clearly show the impact of bedload sheets.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-103-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Soichi Tanabe, 21 Apr 2025
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Chenge An, 26 Mar 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2025
This paper presents two-dimensional morphodynamic modeling simulations investigating how the so-called hydrograph boundary layer influences morphodynamics in straight channels with migrating alternate bars. This topic is a natural progression from prior work on hydrograph boundary layers, which have focused on the one-dimensional (bar-free) condition up until now. I therefore think this paper is relevant and of potential interest to the readers of Earth-Surface Dynamics.
The research presented in the paper is nicely conceived and generally well presented. There are some areas of the presentation and analysis that I find somewhat confusing, and I encourage the authors to consider the comments below in revision.
- More details on the specific set up of the model are needed. What are the initial conditions of the simulations? Was an initial equilibrium bed developed before imposing the hydrograph and constant sediment supply? What was the time step and cell size?
- The description of the calculation of sediment supply rates is also unclear (lines 285-290).
- For Fig 5 (and others) – is it possible to provide movie files of the simulation results as supplemental information? It would be informative to be able to see the evolution of these simulations as they occur.
- Can you provide more description of how the bars emerged? No mention is made of any initial topographic instability, so what led to bar emergence and why at 3km?
- Figure 8: what is “upper low” and “lower low”?
- Figure 13 is somewhat challenging to understand. What does the hysteresis look further upstream (within the HBL)? I wonder if also showing the hysteresis of bed elevation deviation, and/or average surface geometric mean grain size, at the locations chosen for Figure 13 would more clearly show the impact of bedload sheets.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-103-RC2 - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-103', Soichi Tanabe, 21 Apr 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
208 | 55 | 10 | 273 | 11 | 12 |
- HTML: 208
- PDF: 55
- XML: 10
- Total: 273
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1