Preprints
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.173687440.07138680/v1
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.173687440.07138680/v1
09 Apr 2025
 | 09 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Quantifying fire effects on debris flow runout using a morphodynamic model and stochastic surrogates

Elaine T. Spiller, Luke A. McGuire, Palak Patel, Abani Patra, and E. Bruce Pitman

Abstract. Fire affects soil and vegetation, which in turn can promote the initiation and growth of runoff-generated debris flows in steep watersheds. Postfire hazard assessments often focus on identifying the most likely watersheds to produce debris flows, quantifying rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for debris flow initiation, and estimating the volume of potential debris flows. This work seeks to expand on such analyses and forecast downstream debris flow runout and peak flow depth. Here, we report on a high-fidelity computational framework that enables debris flow simulation over two watersheds and the downstream alluvial fan, although at significant computational cost. We then develop a Gaussian Process surrogate model, allowing for rapid prediction of simulator outputs for untested scenarios. We utilize this framework to explore model sensitivity to rainfall intensity and sediment availability as well as parameters associated with saturated hydraulic conductivity, hydraulic roughness, grain size, and sediment entrainment. Simulation results are most sensitive to and grain size. Further, we use this approach to examine variations in debris flow inundation patterns at different stages of postfire recovery. Sensitivity analysis indicates that constraining temporal changes in hydraulic roughness and grain size following fire would be particularly beneficial for forecasting debris flow runout throughout the postfire recovery period. The emulator methodology presented here also provides a means to compute the probability of a debris flow inundating a specific downstream region, consequent to a forecast or design rainstorm. This workflow could be employed in prefire scenario-based planning or postfire hazard assessments.

Share
Elaine T. Spiller, Luke A. McGuire, Palak Patel, Abani Patra, and E. Bruce Pitman

Status: open (until 21 May 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4130', Paul Santi, 22 Apr 2025 reply
Elaine T. Spiller, Luke A. McGuire, Palak Patel, Abani Patra, and E. Bruce Pitman
Elaine T. Spiller, Luke A. McGuire, Palak Patel, Abani Patra, and E. Bruce Pitman

Viewed

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
41 0 0 41 0 0
  • HTML: 41
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 41
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 47 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 47 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
Fire in steep landscapes increases the potential for debris flows that can develop during intense rainstorms. To explore possible debris flow hazards, we utilize a computational model of the physical processes of debris flow initiation and runout. Such process-based models are computationally intensive and of limited use in rapid hazard assessments. Thus we build statistical surrogate of these physical models to examine how inundation footprints vary with rainfall intensity and time since fire.
Share