the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Forecasting agricultural drought: the Australian Agriculture Drought Indicators
Abstract. Drought is a recurrent and significant driver of stress on agricultural enterprises in Australia. Historically, rainfall indices have been used to identify drought and inform government responses. However, rainfall indicators overlook important factors such as drought propagation and commodity prices. To address these shortcomings, AADI (Australian Agriculture Drought Indicators) was recently developed to monitor and forecast drought for upcoming seasons using biophysical and agro-economic models, including crop yields, pasture growth, and farm profit at ~ 5 km2 resolution. Here, we evaluate the skill of drought indicator forecasts driven by the ACCESS-S2 dynamical global climate model over a hindcast period from 1990–2018. Analysis of the AADI hindcasts finds that antecedent landscape conditions significantly enhance predictive skill for crop yields, pasture growth, and farm profit across a financial year. As lead time shortens from 12 to 3 months, forecast confidence increases: median farm profit indicator skill rises from 43 % at 12 months to 67 % and 73 % at 6 and 3 months, respectively, whilst median farm profit biases remain below 2 % across all lead times, with high reliability indicating a well-calibrated ensemble, making the forecasts highly suitable for risk management and decision-making. Forecasts for wheat, sorghum, and pasture are also skilful and reliable in ensemble spread, although residual biases can occur (e.g., up to 20 % for sorghum), which suggests further system refinements are needed. Analysis of historical events in both dry and wet conditions demonstrated the AADI system’s ability to identify drought-impacted areas with increased confidence up to 6 months earlier than rainfall deficits.
- Preprint
(3126 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4129', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Mar 2025
reply
This is my first review of the manuscript Forecasting Agricultural Drought: The Australian Agriculture Drought Indicators by Andrew Schepen et al. The paper is well-written, clear, and highly relevant to the journal. The topic is timely, as forecasting agricultural droughts is a critical area of research with significant implications.
However, I have a few moderate concerns, outlined below:
-
The study primarily focuses on the sensitivity of seasonal forecasting system performance in relation to crop production and farm profit, rather than assessing the system’s ability to predict crop growth. This is because the observations used are not real but rather derived from the same system, forced by ground data. While I do not see this as a weakness, I believe the authors should clarify this distinction when presenting the paper and discussing the results. Additionally, if this study is more of a sensitivity analysis of forecast errors, it would be beneficial to explore the relationship between meteorological forecast errors and crop yield errors. This could provide valuable insights into conditions where the system may struggle to predict crop yield accurately.
-
The dataset description is not sufficiently detailed. I suggest providing more information to improve clarity and transparency.
-
The AADI system should be described more thoroughly. For example, it is unclear whether irrigation is considered and how water limitations are accounted for. Additionally, what would be the impact of these factors? Given that some crops in Australia are irrigated, a discussion on this aspect would enhance the study’s practical relevance.
-
Has the system been tested without post-processing? If so, what is the impact? Including this analysis would provide valuable recommendations for the development of simpler systems in other regions.
Overall, the study is strong, but addressing these points would improve its clarity and impact.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4129-RC1 -
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
92 | 23 | 5 | 120 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 92
- PDF: 23
- XML: 5
- Total: 120
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1