the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improving wheat phenology and yield forecasting with a deep learning-enhanced WOFOST model under extreme weather conditions
Abstract. Extreme weather events pose significant challenges to crop production, making their assessment essential for developing effective climate adaptation strategies. Process-based crop models are valuable for evaluating climate change impacts on crop yields but often struggle to simulate the effects of extreme weather accurately. To fill this knowledge gap, this study introduces WOFOST-EW model, an enhanced version of the World Food Studies Simulation Model (WOFOST), which integrates extreme weather indices and deep learning algorithm to improve simulations of winter wheat growth under extreme conditions. We validate WOFOST-EW using phenological, yield, and extreme weather data from agricultural meteorological stations in the North China Plain. The results show that WOFOST-EW improves simulation accuracy, with heading and maturity dates predicted more accurately by 10.64 % and 12.86 %, respectively. The R² value for yield simulations increases from 0.67 to 0.76. Validation during extreme weather years (2008 and 2018) further highlights the model's improved performance, with the R² increasing from 0.69 to 0.79 in 2008 and from 0.61 to 0.80 in 2018, respectively. WOFOST-EW effectively captures the impacts of extreme weather, offering a reliable tool for agricultural planning and climate adaptation. As extreme weather events become increasingly frequent, WOFOST-EW can assist decision-makers in more accurately evaluating crop yields, providing technical support for agricultural systems in the context of global climate change.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(4319 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1174 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4010', Theodoros Mavrommatis, 09 Apr 2025
This is a significant contribution. Among others issues (noted on the attached manuscript that should be taken care of) a major one is related to the selection of the "extreme" years chosen in this study.
Regards,
Theodoros Mavromatis
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
Thank you very much for your comment. We truly appreciate your recognition of our study as a significant contribution. We have addressed your detailed comments in our response to Reviewer 1.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4010-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4010', Theodoros Mavrommatis, 09 Apr 2025
This is a significant contribution. Among others issues (noted on the attached manuscript that should be taken care of) a major one is related to the selection of the "extreme" years chosen in this study.
Regards,
Theodoros Mavromatis
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
We sincerely thank the reviewer for their valuable feedback on our manuscript. We are grateful for the positive comments recognizing our study as a significant contribution, as well as for the thoughtful suggestions regarding areas for further consideration and future research.
We also apologize for the delayed response to the comments. Our intention was to wait until all reviews had been received in order to revise the manuscript comprehensively and address all comments and suggestions in a consistent manner.
We have now provided detailed responses to each point in the accompanying supplement. Please note there is a supplement to this comment.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4010', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 May 2025
Please find attached my review of egusphere-2024-4010
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
We would like to express our sincere thanks for the reviewer’s thoughtful and detailed evaluation of our manuscript. We have carefully reviewed all comments made directly in the annotated PDF, and the suggested typographical and other minor corrections will be incorporated into the final version of the manuscript.
We also apologize for the delay in our response. We chose to wait until all reviewer comments had been received in order to revise the manuscript comprehensively and address all feedback in a consistent and cohesive manner.
Please note there is a supplement to this comment.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Le Yu, 26 Jun 2025
Data sets
Meteorological data United States National Centers for Environmental Information https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/metadata/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/gov.noaa.ncdc:C00516/html
Soil data ISRIC world soil information https://doi.org/10.17027/isric-wdcsoils.20230327
Model code and software
WOFOST model Allard De Wit et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14785412
SCE-UA algorithm Tobias Houska https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7683999
LSTM model François Chollet et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14785196
WOFOST-EW model Jinhui Zheng https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14859629
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
342 | 197 | 22 | 561 | 38 | 20 | 36 |
- HTML: 342
- PDF: 197
- XML: 22
- Total: 561
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 36
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1