the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characteristics of ecosystems under various anthropogenic impacts in a tropical forest region of Southeast Asia
Abstract. Given the severe anthropogenic pressure on tropical forests and the high demand for field observations of ecosystem characteristics, it is crucial to collect such data both in pristine tropical forests and in the converted deforested land-cover classes. To gain insight into the ecosystem characteristics of pristine tropical forests, regrowth forests, and cashew plantations, we established an ecosystem monitoring site in Phnom Kulen National Park, Cambodia. Here, we present the first observed datasets at this site of forest inventories, leaf area index, leaf traits of woody species, a fraction of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation, and soil and meteorological conditions. We examined how land-cover change affects the species and functional diversity, stand structure, and soil conditions among the three land-cover classes. We found significant reductions in several ecosystem characteristics, caused by the anthropogenic land cover conversion, which underlines the profound impact land-cover change has on ecosystem productivity, resilience, and functioning in these tropical forest regions. We further investigated relationships between diameters at breast height and tree height, and demonstrated the feasibility of locally updating aboveground biomass estimates using power-law functions. These datasets and findings can contribute to filling data gaps in tropical forest research, addressing global environmental challenges, and supporting sustainable forest management. The datasets are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10146582 (Sovann et al., 2024a) and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10159726 (Sovann et al., 2024b), and future data from the field site will be uploaded on a regular basis to https://zenodo.org/communities/cambodia_ecosystem_data.
- Preprint
(2716 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3434 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 27 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3784', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Feb 2025
reply
Characteristics of ecosystems under various anthropogenic impacts in a tropical forest region of Southeast Asia
I congratulate the authors on their work. The manuscript presents a broad assessment of forest structural characteristics across different land uses in Cambodia. However, the authors have not fully explored the potential of this extensive dataset.
For instance, the introduction should clearly justify the importance of sampling these variables, which range from functional traits to climatic factors. As it stands, the study is primarily descriptive and lacks a hypothesis-driven approach. Strengthening these aspects would significantly improve the manuscript.
Abstract:
L16: "Reduction in ecosystem characteristics" is unclear—consider rephrasing.
Graphical Abstract:
Avoid abbreviations without prior explanation (e.g., fPAR).
Introduction:
L33: Consider citing Pan et al. (2024, Science) for a more up-to-date reference.
Methods:
L75: Clarify the source of the carbon sink information.
L94: The characterisation of this area would be more useful in the main file rather than as supplementary material.
L158–L162: Since plots have different sampling efforts, use rarefied richness instead of raw species number.
L175: I recommend using genus/family values before the mean plot value.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3784-RC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', chansopheaktra sovann, 12 Mar 2025
reply
Characteristics of ecosystems under various anthropogenic impacts in a tropical forest region of Southeast Asia
Manuscript DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3784
Comment’s citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3784-RC1
Response to Referee’s comments (RC1)
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3784', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Feb 2025 reply
Comment 1. I congratulate the authors on their work. The manuscript presents a broad assessment of forest structural characteristics across different land uses in Cambodia. However, the authors have not fully explored the potential of this extensive dataset.
For instance, the introduction should clearly justify the importance of sampling these variables, which range from functional traits to climatic factors. As it stands, the study is primarily descriptive and lacks a hypothesis-driven approach. Strengthening these aspects would significantly improve the manuscript.
Response 1. Thank you for your thoughtful feedback and for recognizing the value of our work. We appreciate your suggestion to strengthen the justification for sampling key ecosystem characteristics. In response, we have revised the third paragraph of the introduction to better highlight the significance of the collected variables, including forest inventory, leaf functional traits, leaf area index (LAI), fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR), and soil conditions, supported by additional references (Page 3, Lines 45–59).
We find it difficult to convert the study into a having a more hypothesis-driven approach, given that there are so many different variables that are measured. But, we fully agree that the aims and objectives should not be primarily descriptive, but to more focus on the analysis of impact of the land cover conversion. Hence, we have rewritten the fourth paragraph of the introduction to clearly articulate the study's objectives. Specifically, we now emphasize our primary aim of assessing differences in stand structure, species diversity, leaf functional traits, and soil conditions between pristine tropical forests and the land cover types resulting from deforestation (regrowth forests and cashew plantations). Our second objective was to analyse the relationships between the characteristics and how these are influenced by land cover conversions. Lastly, we highlight our final objective of presenting and sharing this unique dataset to contribute to broader ecosystem research (Page 3, Lines 60–68).
Comment 2. Abstract: L16: "Reduction in ecosystem characteristics" is unclear—consider rephrasing.
Response 2. We agree. We have rephrased "Reductions in several ecosystem characteristics" to “differences in these ecosystem characteristics" (Page 1, Lines 16–18).
Comment 3. Graphical Abstract: Avoid abbreviations without prior explanation (e.g., fPAR).
Response 3. Thank you for pointing this out. We have replaced “fPAR” with “fraction of photosynthetically active radiation” in the graphical abstract (Page 1, Lines 26).
Comment 4. Introduction: L33: Consider citing Pan et al. (2024, Science) for a more up-to-date reference.
Response 4. Thank you for this suggestion. We have updated the reference to Pan et al., 2024 and revised the text from “store approximately 60 % of the global terrestrial biomass (Pan et al., 2013)” to “account for approximately 70 % of the global forest gross carbon sink (Pan et al., 2024)” (Page 2, Lines 30–31).
Comment 5. Methods: L75: Clarify the source of the carbon sink information.
Response 5. We have added a new reference (Kim et al., 2023) to support our statement that Kulen is a potential carbon sink (Pages 3–4, Lines 73–74).
Comment 6. L94: The characterization of this area would be more useful in the main file rather than as supplementary material.
Response 6. We agree. Table S1.1 has been modified and moved to the main text as Table 1 (Pages 5–6, Line 92), and all table numbers in the main text and supplementary material have been updated accordingly.
Comment 7. L158–L162: Since plots have different sampling efforts, use rarefied richness instead of raw species number.
Response 7. We disagree with the comment that our plots have different sampling efforts. and prefer to use raw species numbers instead of rarefied richness. Rarefaction methods are typically applied when there are differences in sampling effort (Staudhammer et al., 2018). Our forest inventory for each land cover consisted of three plots with the same plot size, and all inventories were conducted within the same week in December 2020 following the same protocol of the National Forest Inventory of Cambodia (Page 4, Line 86; Page 6, Line 98). Therefore, we believe that raw species counts are suitable and more straightforward comparisons between land covers.
Comment 8. L175: I recommend using genus/family values before the mean plot value.
Response 8. Thanks for this great suggestion and have revised the methods accordingly (Page 8–9, Lines 176–178). The results in both the main text and supplementary material have been updated to reflect this methodological change. However, this adjustment had a minimal effect on the overall analysis, as only four species (Agave sisalana, Dialium cochinchinense, Syzygium formosanum, and Madhuca elliptica) had missing trait values.
References
Kim, S., Horn, S., Sok, P., Sien, T., & Yorn, C. (2023). Ecosystem Carbon Stock Assessment in Upland Forest: A Case Study in Koh Kong, Mondulkiri, Preah Vihear, and Siem Reap Provinces. Environmental and Rural Development, 61.
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L., Houghton, R. A., Fang, J., Kauppi, P. E., . . . Murdiyarso, D. (2024). The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature, 631(8021), 563-569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x
Pan, Y. D., Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L., & Jackson, R. B. (2013). The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of the World's Forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol 44, 44(1), 593-+. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135914
Staudhammer, C. L., Escobedo, F. J., & Blood, A. (2018). Assessing methods for comparing species diversity from disparate data sources: the case of urban and peri-urban forests. Ecosphere, 9(10), e02450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2450
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', chansopheaktra sovann, 12 Mar 2025
reply
Data sets
Weather conditions from 20220410 to 20240409 in Kulen, Cambodia Chansopheaktra Sovann, Torbern Tagesson, Patrik Vestin, Sothea Kok, and Stefan Olin https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13756906
Forest inventory, leaf area index, and leaf functional traits of various land cover classes in Kulen, Cambodia Chansopheaktra Sovann, Torbern Tagesson, Sothea Kok, and Stefan Olin https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10146582
Daily fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR), edaphic, and weather conditions from 20220410 to 20230409 in Kulen, Cambodia Chansopheaktra Sovann, Torbern Tagesson, Patrik Vestin, Sothea Kok, and Stefan Olin https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10159726
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
164 | 49 | 7 | 220 | 27 | 3 | 3 |
- HTML: 164
- PDF: 49
- XML: 7
- Total: 220
- Supplement: 27
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 57 | 28 |
Sweden | 2 | 31 | 15 |
Cambodia | 3 | 23 | 11 |
Brazil | 4 | 13 | 6 |
France | 5 | 10 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 57