the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hemispheric differences in ozone across the stratosphere-troposphere exchange region
Abstract. This study examined the ozone mixing ratios in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere (UTLS) to determine whether the ozone levels in the lowermost stratosphere are lower in the Southern (SH) than in the Northern Hemisphere (NH), as suggested by total column ozone observations. We utilized unique in situ measurements from the High Altitude and Long Range research aircraft deployed over the southernmost region of South America (45–60° S) in September–November 2019 as a part of the Southern Hemisphere Transport, Dynamics, and Chemistry (SouthTRAC) research campaign. In addition, the mission period enabled us to examine the impact of an early stratospheric sudden warming (SSW) event, which triggered a breakdown of the southern polar vortex in September 2019. In situ measurements from IAGOS commercial aircraft (45–60° N), ozonesondes (Patagonia) and CAMS reanalysis data were considered for comparative analysis. Stratospheric air was identified using relative humidity (<20 %) and carbon monoxide (<50 nmol mol-1) thresholds. Our results show that air masses of stratospheric origin had higher ozone abundances in the NH UTLS than in the SH (between 300–200 hPa and 45–60° latitude). In high ozone depletion years in the stratospheric vortex, the SH ozone median (170 nmol mol-1) was only 51 % of that in the NH (330 nmol mol-1), while in low depletion years, SH ozone median (210 nmol mol-1) reached 57 % of the NH values (370 nmol mol-1). The SSW event increased SH UTLS by 37 % (46 nmol mol-1) during the SouthTRAC mission compared to high depletion years.
- Preprint
(8855 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3873 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3719', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jan 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3719/egusphere-2024-3719-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3719', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Feb 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3719/egusphere-2024-3719-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
CC1: 'Community Comment on egusphere-2024-3719', Keding Lu, 10 Feb 2025
Comments by Keding Lu on behalf of the TOAR-II Steering Committee on:
Hemispheric differences in ozone across the stratosphere-troposphere exchange region
Rodrigo J. Seguel (corresponding author), Charlie Opazo, Yann Cohen, Owen R. Cooper, Laura Gallardo, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, Florian Obersteiner, Andreas Zahn, Peter Hoor, Susanne Rohs
This manuscript was submitted to ACP as part of the TOAR-II Community Special Issue
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3719
Discussion started: 13 Dec 2024
This review is by Keding Lu, member of the TOAR-II Steering Committee. The primary purpose of these reviews is to identify any discrepancies across the TOAR-II submissions, and to allow the author teams time to address the discrepancies. Additional comments may be included with the reviews.
While members of the TOAR Steering Committee may post open comments on papers submitted to the TOAR-II Community Special Issue, they are not involved with the decision to accept or reject a paper for publication, which is entirely handled by the journal’s editorial team.
General comments
The differences bettwen the NH and SH mid-latitude UTLS ozone concentrations are of high interest for both the global radiative forcing and the global ozone budget studies. This paper provide timely analysis on a super valuable dataset on the mid-latitude SH UTLS measurements which could open a window of this demanding topic.
This manuscript has already received two thorough and critical reviews from two anonymous referees regarding the scope, scientific analysis and structure of the paper and I don’t have anything to add. Nevertheless, I would agree with the two reviewers that the significant different sample size could be a point to further address of which in this case the two ozone sonde observations in SH could be considered.
Overall, for my responsibility, I just found no discrepancies between the conclusions and the findings of other papers submitted so far to the TOAR-II Community Special Issue.
Technical comments
- The term ‘ozone’ is sometimes depicted as ‘O3’ in both text and figures, maybe the authors can choose ‘O3’ in all the figures while ‘ozone’ in the text, in addition, the font style might be synchronized too.
- The lead author Rodrigo J. Seguel is also a member of the TOAR Steering Committee who are familiar with all the TOAR-II technical requirements. I would like to advertise herein again that TOAR-II has produced two guidance documents to help authors develop their manuscripts so that results can be consistently compared across the wide range of studies that will be written for the TOAR-II Community Special Issue. Both guidance documents can be found on the TOAR-II webpage: https://igacproject.org/activities/TOAR/TOAR-II. The two guidance documents are “The TOAR-II Community Special Issue Guidelines” and “Guidance note on best statistical practices for TOAR analyses”. This message might be useful for the reviewers and readers to consider.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3719-CC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
234 | 56 | 12 | 302 | 25 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 234
- PDF: 56
- XML: 12
- Total: 302
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 118 | 39 |
Germany | 2 | 41 | 13 |
Chile | 3 | 22 | 7 |
China | 4 | 18 | 5 |
France | 5 | 14 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 118