Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-348
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-348
12 Feb 2024
 | 12 Feb 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

When and why microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models can be unstable

Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni

Abstract. Microbial-explicit soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling models are increasingly recognized for their advantages over linear models in describing SOC dynamics. These models are known to exhibit oscillations, but it is not clear when they yield stable vs. unstable equilibrium points (EPs) – i.e. EPs that exist analytically, but are not stable to small perturbations and cannot be reached by transient simulations. Occurrence of such unstable EPs can lead to unexpected model behaviour in transient simulations or unrealistic predictions of steady state soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Here we ask when and why unstable EPs can occur in an archetypal microbial-explicit model (representing SOC, dissolved OC [DOC], microbial biomass, and extracellular enzymes) and some simplified versions of it. Further, if a model formulation allows for physically meaningful but unstable EPs, can we find constraints in the model parameters (i.e. environmental conditions and microbial traits) that ensure stability of the EPs? We use analytical, numerical and descriptive tools to answer these questions. We found that instability can occur when the resupply of a growth substrate (DOC) is (via a positive feedback loop) dependent on its abundance. We identified a conservative, sufficient condition on model parameters to ensure stability of EPs. Interactive effects of environmental conditions and parameters describing microbial physiology point to the relevance of basic ecological principles for avoidance of unrealistic (i.e. unstable) simulation outcomes. These insights can help to improve applicability of microbial-explicit models, aid our understanding of the dynamics of these models and highlight the relation between mathematical requirements and (in silico) microbial ecology.

Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni

Status: open (until 04 Apr 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni
Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni

Viewed

Total article views: 205 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
160 39 6 205 18 1 2
  • HTML: 160
  • PDF: 39
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 205
  • Supplement: 18
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 200 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 200 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Occurrence of unstable equilibrium points (EPs) could impede applicability of microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models. For archetypal model versions we identified when instability can occur and describe mathematical conditions to avoid such unstable EPs. We discuss implications for further model development, highlighting the important role of considering basic ecological principles to ensure biologically meaningful models.