Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2161
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2161
30 Sep 2024
 | 30 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Determining optimal sampling conditions in the TSI Nanometer Aerosol Sampler 3089

Behnaz Alinaghipour, Sadegh Niazi, Robert Groth, Branka Miljevic, and Zoran Ristovski

Abstract. Physicochemical characterisation of airborne particles requires appropriate sampling and deposition methods. The TSI Nanometer Aerosol Sampler 3089 (TSI NAS) has predominantly been used as an electrostatic precipitator for depositing airborne particles, enabling subsequent offline characterization through techniques such as electron microscopy. However, the optimal sampling time of TSI NAS for varying input concentrations has not been thoroughly investigated. This is extremely important as the concentration of particles in different environments differ significantly. This study aimed to establish the appropriate sampling durations of TSI NAS for various input concentrations, or conversely, to determine suitable input concentrations for a fixed sampling duration. We developed an experimental set up and a linear regression model to predict conditions conducive to efficiently collecting loaded samples, particularly at low concentrations, such as exhaled particles from the human respiratory tract or marine aerosol particles. Experiments were conducted using the TSI NAS 3089 at a flow rate of 1 L⋅min-1 and a voltage of -9 kV. Three particle types, nebulised from different solutions at low, medium, and high concentrations, were sampled over durations of 1, 3, and 6 hours. Deposition densities were subsequently analysed using ImageJ software. The findings revealed a linear relationship between deposition density and the product of particle concentration and sampling time, with a recommended density range of 0.015 to 0.1 #⋅µm-2 for particles with a count median diameter of approximately 100 nm and average circularity of 0.56 ± 0.25. Despite potential factors affecting the accuracy of the model, such as the number of samples, random collisions, and potential overload in high-concentration experiments, it provides a valuable predictive tool for determining optimal sampling times. The suggested linear regression model is applicable across various research areas, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of airborne particle characterisation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Behnaz Alinaghipour, Sadegh Niazi, Robert Groth, Branka Miljevic, and Zoran Ristovski

Status: open (until 05 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Behnaz Alinaghipour, Sadegh Niazi, Robert Groth, Branka Miljevic, and Zoran Ristovski
Behnaz Alinaghipour, Sadegh Niazi, Robert Groth, Branka Miljevic, and Zoran Ristovski

Viewed

Total article views: 48 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
41 5 2 48 0 1
  • HTML: 41
  • PDF: 5
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 48
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 48 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 48 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
Airborne particles are crucial in environmental and health studies, requiring precise sampling for accurate characterisation. Our study examines the optimal sampling time for the TSI Nanometer Aerosol Sampler 3089 at different input concentrations. Aerosols from low, medium and high concentration environments were sampled over 1, 3, and 6 hours. A linear relationship was observed using a regression model between the deposition densities and the product of input concentration and sampling time.