Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1967
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1967
26 Jul 2024
 | 26 Jul 2024

Potential of carbon uptake and local aerosol production in boreal and hemi-boreal ecosystems across Finland and in Estonia

Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala

Abstract. Continental ecosystems play an important role in carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake and aerosol production, which helps to mitigate climate change. The concept of ‘CarbonSink+ potential’ enables a direct comparison of CO2 uptake and local aerosol production at ecosystem scale. Following this concept, momentary net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and number concentration of negative intermediate ions at 2.0–2.3 nm (Nneg) were analysed for boreal and hemi-boreal ecosystems across Finland and in Estonia. Nneg can tell us how effectively biogenic emissions from an ecosystem initiate the new particle formation. Four forests, three agricultural fields, an open peatland, an urban garden, and a coastal site were included focusing on summertime. We compared the NEE and Nneg at each site to the Hyytiälä forest as it is the dominant ecosystem type in Finland. Nneg was highest at the urban garden and lowest at the coastal site. The agricultural fields had higher or similar net CO2 uptake rate and higher Nneg than all studied forests. The median net CO2 uptake rate of the open peatland was only 31 % of that in Hyytiälä, while the median Nneg was 77 % of that in Hyytiälä. The median net CO2 uptake rate in the urban garden was 63 % of that in Hyytiälä, implying the importance of urban green areas in CO2 sequestration. The coastal site was a minor CO2 source. Considering the combined effect of CO2 uptake and aerosol formation and the large area of forests in Finland, the forests are the most important ecosystems helping to mitigate climate warming.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Jul 2025
Potential of carbon uptake and local aerosol production in boreal and hemi-boreal ecosystems across Finland and in Estonia
Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala
Biogeosciences, 22, 3235–3251, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3235-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3235-2025, 2025
Short summary
Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1967', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Sep 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1967', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Sep 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1967', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Sep 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1967', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Sep 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (09 Dec 2024) by Akihiko Ito
AR by Piaopiao Ke on behalf of the Authors (23 Dec 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Jan 2025) by Akihiko Ito
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (22 Jan 2025)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (22 Jan 2025) by Akihiko Ito
AR by Piaopiao Ke on behalf of the Authors (26 Feb 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (03 Mar 2025) by Akihiko Ito
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (12 Mar 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (28 Mar 2025) by Akihiko Ito
AR by Piaopiao Ke on behalf of the Authors (03 Apr 2025)  Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Piaopiao Ke on behalf of the Authors (04 Jul 2025)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (05 Jul 2025) by Akihiko Ito

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Jul 2025
Potential of carbon uptake and local aerosol production in boreal and hemi-boreal ecosystems across Finland and in Estonia
Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala
Biogeosciences, 22, 3235–3251, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3235-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3235-2025, 2025
Short summary
Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala
Piaopiao Ke, Anna Lintunen, Pasi Kolari, Annalea Lohila, Santeri Tuovinen, Janne Lampilahti, Roseline Thakur, Maija Peltola, Otso Peräkylä, Tuomo Nieminen, Ekaterina Ezhova, Mari Pihlatie, Asta Laasonen, Markku Koskinen, Helena Rautakoski, Laura Heimsch, Tom Kokkonen, Aki Vähä, Ivan Mammarella, Steffen Noe, Jaana Bäck, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala

Viewed

Total article views: 1,101 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
534 162 405 1,101 87 28 48
  • HTML: 534
  • PDF: 162
  • XML: 405
  • Total: 1,101
  • Supplement: 87
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,058 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,058 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Jul 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Our research explores diverse ecosystems’ role in climate cooling via the concept of CarbonSink+ Potential. We measured CO2 uptake and loaal aerosol production in forests, farms, peatlands, urban gardens, and coastal areas across Finland and Estonia. The long-term data reveal that while forests are vital regarding CarbonSink+ Potential, farms and urban gardens also play significant roles. These insights can help optimize management policy of natural resource to mitigate global warming.
Share