the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Tropospheric Ozone sensing with a differential absorption lidar based on single CO2 Raman cell
Abstract. This study presents the development and performance evaluation of an ozone differential absorption lidar system. The system could effectively obtain vertical profiles of lower tropospheric ozone in an altitude range of 0.3 to 4 km with high spatiotemporal resolutions. The system emits three laser beams at wavelengths of 276 nm, 287 nm, 299 nm by using the stimulated Raman effect of carbon dioxide (CO2). A 250 mm telescope and a grating spectrometer are used to collect and separate the backscattering signals at the three wavelengths. Considering the influences of aerosol interference and statistical error, a wavelength pair of 276 nm–287 nm is used for the altitude below 600 m and a wavelength pair of 287 nm–299 nm is used for the altitude above 600 m to invert ozone concentration. We also evaluated the errors caused by the uncertainty of the wavelength index. The developed ozone lidar was deployed in a field campaign that was conducted to measure the vertical profiles of ozone using a tethered balloon platform. The lidar observations agree very well with those of the tethered balloon platform.
- Preprint
(1570 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1853', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jul 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Dear Editor:
We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions of the editor and reviewers very much on our manuscript entitled “Tropospheric Ozone sensing with a differential absorption lidar based on single CO2 Raman cell” (MS NO: egusphere-2024-1853).
We have studied the reviewer’s comments carefully and have made the corresponding revisions. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. We would like to express our great appreciation to you and the reviewers for the helpful comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Guangqiang Fan, Yibin Fu and Juntao Huo
on behalf of all the authors.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1853', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Sep 2024
The manuscript presents a novel setup of ozone lidar using CO2 Raman tube and its application in several field measurements. The instrument seems to be very promising. The result of the comparison between lidar and vertical measurement was fantastic. Though there are plenty of sloppy writing problems and a few technique questions, current manuscript is worthy to publish. I would recommend a major revision after addressing the following comments.
Comments:
Line 50: ‘Fuel laser‘? Or dye laser?
Line 57: H2 and D2
Line 58: Lidar can not be deployed by lidar.
Line 61-65: Please rephrase this sentence.
Line 108: Nd:YAG. The sentence also needs to be improved.
Line 118: Give the reason why 276nm laser can only be used under 600m.
Line 127-129: SO2 interference should be addressed in detail, here and in section 4.
Line 147: How about the rest power of the pumping laser? Does 266nm laser still exist in the output laser beam?
Line 166-167: Please rephrase this sentence. The reason to use JGS1 quartz should be mentioned.
Line 199: What is the meaning of 4000 laser pulse? Total measurement time?
Line 204: How to determine the statistical error should use more serious statistics. Currently the error estimation method as well as clear conclusion of the estimation are missing. The same for section 4.2.
Line 229: I can not find where the aerosol extinction coefficient is less than 0.3 km-1 in Fig.7.
Line 236: ‘times’?
Line 251: Something missing before ‘therefore’.
Line 285: Fig.12 is not readable.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1853-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Dear Editor:
We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions of the editor and reviewers very much on our manuscript entitled “Tropospheric Ozone sensing with a differential absorption lidar based on single CO2 Raman cell” (MS NO: egusphere-2024-1853).
We have studied the reviewer’s comments carefully and have made the corresponding revisions. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. We would like to express our great appreciation to you and the reviewers for the helpful comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Guangqiang Fan, Yibin Fu and Juntao Huo
on behalf of all the authors.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1853', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jul 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Dear Editor:
We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions of the editor and reviewers very much on our manuscript entitled “Tropospheric Ozone sensing with a differential absorption lidar based on single CO2 Raman cell” (MS NO: egusphere-2024-1853).
We have studied the reviewer’s comments carefully and have made the corresponding revisions. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. We would like to express our great appreciation to you and the reviewers for the helpful comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Guangqiang Fan, Yibin Fu and Juntao Huo
on behalf of all the authors.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-1853', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Sep 2024
The manuscript presents a novel setup of ozone lidar using CO2 Raman tube and its application in several field measurements. The instrument seems to be very promising. The result of the comparison between lidar and vertical measurement was fantastic. Though there are plenty of sloppy writing problems and a few technique questions, current manuscript is worthy to publish. I would recommend a major revision after addressing the following comments.
Comments:
Line 50: ‘Fuel laser‘? Or dye laser?
Line 57: H2 and D2
Line 58: Lidar can not be deployed by lidar.
Line 61-65: Please rephrase this sentence.
Line 108: Nd:YAG. The sentence also needs to be improved.
Line 118: Give the reason why 276nm laser can only be used under 600m.
Line 127-129: SO2 interference should be addressed in detail, here and in section 4.
Line 147: How about the rest power of the pumping laser? Does 266nm laser still exist in the output laser beam?
Line 166-167: Please rephrase this sentence. The reason to use JGS1 quartz should be mentioned.
Line 199: What is the meaning of 4000 laser pulse? Total measurement time?
Line 204: How to determine the statistical error should use more serious statistics. Currently the error estimation method as well as clear conclusion of the estimation are missing. The same for section 4.2.
Line 229: I can not find where the aerosol extinction coefficient is less than 0.3 km-1 in Fig.7.
Line 236: ‘times’?
Line 251: Something missing before ‘therefore’.
Line 285: Fig.12 is not readable.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1853-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Dear Editor:
We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions of the editor and reviewers very much on our manuscript entitled “Tropospheric Ozone sensing with a differential absorption lidar based on single CO2 Raman cell” (MS NO: egusphere-2024-1853).
We have studied the reviewer’s comments carefully and have made the corresponding revisions. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. We would like to express our great appreciation to you and the reviewers for the helpful comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Guangqiang Fan, Yibin Fu and Juntao Huo
on behalf of all the authors.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Guangqiang Fan, 18 Oct 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
295 | 106 | 247 | 648 | 11 | 12 |
- HTML: 295
- PDF: 106
- XML: 247
- Total: 648
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1