the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Inter-relations of precipitation, aerosols, and clouds over Andalusia, Southern Spain revealed by the AGORA Observatory
Abstract. The south-central interior of Andalusia experiences intricate precipitation patterns as a result of its semi-arid Mediterranean climate and the impact of Saharan dust and human-made pollutants. The primary aim of this study is to monitor the inter-relations between various factors, such as aerosols, clouds, and meteorological variables, and precipitation systems in Granada using ground-based remote sensing and in situ instruments including microwave radiometer, ceilometer, cloud radar, nephelometer, and weather station. The objective is to identify potential properties of precipitation in the region and in that way improve precipitation forecasting. Over an 11-year period, we detected rain events using a physical retrieval method that employed microwave radiometer measurements. A composite analysis was applied to them to construct a climatology of the temporal evolution of precipitation. It was found that convective rain is the dominant precipitation type in Granada, accounting for 68 % of the rain events. The height of the cloud base is mainly distributed at an altitude of 2 to 7 km. Integrated water vapor (IWV) and integrated cloud liquid water (ILW) increase rapidly before the onset of rain. Aerosol scattering at surface level and hence the aerosol concentration is reduced during rain, and the predominant mean size distribution of aerosol particles before, during, and after rain is almost the same. A meteorological environment favorable for virga formation is observed in Granada. The surface weather station detected rainfall later than the microwave radiometer, indicating virga according to ceilometer and cloud radar data. We used rain-day events identified by weather station data to determine precipitation intensity classes and found that light rain is the main precipitation intensity class in Granada, accounting for 72 % of the rain-day events. This can be a result of the high tropospheric temperature induced by the Andalusian climate and the reduction of cloud droplet size by the high availability of aerosol particles in the urban atmosphere. This study provides evidence that aerosols, clouds, and meteorological variables have a combined impact on precipitation which can be considered for water resource management and improving rain forecasting accuracy.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(11945 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(11945 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-795', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 May 2023
The subject of the paper is certainly of scientifc relevance, as made clear in the Introduction. I could imagine that the data set the authors present is very valuable and bears potenital for an in-depth analysis of the precipitation processes over Andalusia and their relation of aerosols.
However, from my point of view, this manuscript does not meet required scientific standards. Essential ones are missing, such as formulation of a clear research question/hypothesis, presentation of comprehensible methods, discussion of the uncertainties of the applied methods, scientifcally sound relation of the results to the derived conclusions. Also, the drawn conclusions as presented here do not really present novel findings as far as I see. Additionally, a number of formulations are scientically unprecise.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-795-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-795', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2023
The manuscript explores the precipitation properties in Granada using a set of remote sensing and in situ instruments. The study focuses on the relationship between precipitation and aerosols, measured over 11 years. There are minor corrections to be made by the authors, but the overall manuscript is very good and well-written. Thus, I suggest the manuscript to be published.
Line 5: I would say that the objective is to characterize the precipitation events regarding the aerosol and meteorological properties, with much less emphasis on forecasting. In particular, the forecast aspect of the paper is not discussed enough to have it as a clear aim of the study.
Line 15: How many rain-day events were identified by the weather station data? Please make it clear here.
Line 126: I suggest replacing “etc” with “among other products”.
Line 135: replace “uJ” by “µJ”
I suggest the authors indicate in the manuscript methodology section, together with the start period of measurement, the amount (percentage) of data used in the study for each instrument. It is unclear if there are gaps in the measurements that could add bias to the data.
Regarding the nephelometer measurements, did the authors correct the data for standard temperature and pressure measurements? What were the humidity conditions in which the data were collected? This information must be explicit in the manuscript.
Line 174: remove the extra “.”. After “zenith”, add a “;” and remove the “.”.
Lines 269-271: I suggest moving the sentences “The scattering coefficient could be used as a proxy of aerosol mass or volume concentration while the AE provides an estimation of the predominant aerosol mean size at dry conditions. Values of AE>2 indicate a predominance of fine particles while values of AE<1 indicate the predominance of coarse particles.” to the in situ measurements section.
Lines 275 - 276: the authors stated: “Thus, the diurnal variation pattern of aerosols is not the main cause of the significant increase in scattering coefficient 4 hours prior to the onset of rain”. I suggest the authors add a figure (which could be, for instance, in the supplementary material) confirming this affirmation.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-795-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-795', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 May 2023
The subject of the paper is certainly of scientifc relevance, as made clear in the Introduction. I could imagine that the data set the authors present is very valuable and bears potenital for an in-depth analysis of the precipitation processes over Andalusia and their relation of aerosols.
However, from my point of view, this manuscript does not meet required scientific standards. Essential ones are missing, such as formulation of a clear research question/hypothesis, presentation of comprehensible methods, discussion of the uncertainties of the applied methods, scientifcally sound relation of the results to the derived conclusions. Also, the drawn conclusions as presented here do not really present novel findings as far as I see. Additionally, a number of formulations are scientically unprecise.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-795-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-795', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2023
The manuscript explores the precipitation properties in Granada using a set of remote sensing and in situ instruments. The study focuses on the relationship between precipitation and aerosols, measured over 11 years. There are minor corrections to be made by the authors, but the overall manuscript is very good and well-written. Thus, I suggest the manuscript to be published.
Line 5: I would say that the objective is to characterize the precipitation events regarding the aerosol and meteorological properties, with much less emphasis on forecasting. In particular, the forecast aspect of the paper is not discussed enough to have it as a clear aim of the study.
Line 15: How many rain-day events were identified by the weather station data? Please make it clear here.
Line 126: I suggest replacing “etc” with “among other products”.
Line 135: replace “uJ” by “µJ”
I suggest the authors indicate in the manuscript methodology section, together with the start period of measurement, the amount (percentage) of data used in the study for each instrument. It is unclear if there are gaps in the measurements that could add bias to the data.
Regarding the nephelometer measurements, did the authors correct the data for standard temperature and pressure measurements? What were the humidity conditions in which the data were collected? This information must be explicit in the manuscript.
Line 174: remove the extra “.”. After “zenith”, add a “;” and remove the “.”.
Lines 269-271: I suggest moving the sentences “The scattering coefficient could be used as a proxy of aerosol mass or volume concentration while the AE provides an estimation of the predominant aerosol mean size at dry conditions. Values of AE>2 indicate a predominance of fine particles while values of AE<1 indicate the predominance of coarse particles.” to the in situ measurements section.
Lines 275 - 276: the authors stated: “Thus, the diurnal variation pattern of aerosols is not the main cause of the significant increase in scattering coefficient 4 hours prior to the onset of rain”. I suggest the authors add a figure (which could be, for instance, in the supplementary material) confirming this affirmation.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-795-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Wenyue Wang, 04 Oct 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
423 | 143 | 26 | 592 | 17 | 15 |
- HTML: 423
- PDF: 143
- XML: 26
- Total: 592
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Klemens Hocke
Leonardo Nania
Alberto Cazorla
Gloria Titos
Renaud Matthey
Lucas Alados-Arboledas
Agustín Millares
Francisco Navas-Guzmán
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(11945 KB) - Metadata XML