the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
From atmospheric water isotopes measurement to firn core interpretation in Adelie Land: A case study for isotope-enabled atmospheric models in Antarctica
Abstract. In a context of global warming and sea level rise acceleration, it is key to estimate the evolution of the atmospheric hydrological cycle and temperature in the polar regions, which directly influence the surface mass balance of the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets. Direct observations are available from satellite data for the last 40 years and a few weather data since the 50’s in Antarctica. One of the best ways to access longer records is to use climate proxies in firn or ice cores. The water isotopic composition in these cores is widely used to reconstruct past temperature variations.
In order to progress in our understanding of the influence of the atmospheric hydrological cycle on the water isotopic composition, we first present a 2-year long time series of vapor and precipitation isotopic composition measurement at Dumont d’Urville station, in Adélie Land. We characterize diurnal variations of meteorological parameters (temperature, humidity and δ18O) for the different seasons and to determine the evolution of key relationships (δ18O versus temperature or humidity) along the year: we found mean annual slopes of 0.5 and 0.4 ‰ °C−1 for the relationship of δ18O vs. temperature in the water vapor and in the precipitation respectively. Then, this data set is used to evaluate the Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM6-wiso (model version with embedded water stable isotopes) in a region where local conditions are controlled by strong katabatic winds which directly impact the isotopic signal. We show that a combination of continental (79 %) and oceanic (21 %) grid cells leads model outputs (temperature, humidity and δ18O) to nicely fit the observations, even winter extreme synoptic events are represented in the model. Therefore we demonstrate the added value of long-term water vapor isotopic composition records. Then, as a clear link is found between water vapor and precipitation isotopic composition, we evaluate how isotopic enabled models can help interpreting short firn cores.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(11879 KB)
-
Supplement
(2392 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(11879 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2392 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-447', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-447/egusphere-2023-447-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 21 Jun 2023
Dear reviewer,
I thank you for those precious comments. This will help improving the quality of this paper and I will include them in the next version.
Christophe
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-447-AC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 19 Sep 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 21 Jun 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-447', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Jul 2023
This manuscript reports on new 2-year long time series of atmospheric water vapor and precipitation isotopic composition measurements at Dumont d’Urville station, in Adelie Land. The authors provide diurnal and seasonal variations of meteorological parameters and isotopic compositions of atmospheric water vapor and precipitation, determine the relationships of delta 18O and temperature (humidity). Then, they evaluate the simulations from ECHAM6-wiso and quantify contributions of continental and oceanic grid cells to fit the observations. They also simulated delta 18O record in S1C1 firn core using temperature and precipitation from ERA5 or ECHAM6-wiso. They conclude that ECHAM6-wiso allows to better explain the delta 18O record in firn core than with the only influence of temperature.
Overall, the narrative of this manuscript is easy to follow, and the necessity of this study is well elaborated. The data analysis provides enough evidences for the conclusion. I would recommend the editor accept the manuscript after minor revision. I have following general comments:
- The abstract is a bit cursory without concision, and lacks some important conclusions. I would suggest the authors rewrite it.
- The description of the isotopic calibration is lacking detail and uncertainties. The plots of drift correction should be provided in SI. Delta 18O-humidity calibration data from SDM are missed in Fig. S2.
- The influence of synoptic events does not address very well. Some descriptions are not clear at seasonal or events scales. For instance, what is the difference of such events between winter and summer, and what is the reason for those distinct influences in L150-155? How could get the conclusion in L315-317?
- The evaluation of d-excess from ECHAM6-wiso is missing in section 3.2. The d-excess variability is well established from observations, but does not show any related analysis to combine with simulations. Why?
- I can not get the point clearly in L243-246. It seems controversial with the conclusion.
- Increase all font sizes in figures and figures are too small to see details.
- It is hard to compare the vapor data and precipitation data when they are plotted on separate panels with distinct axis scales in Fig. S9.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-447-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 19 Sep 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-447', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Jun 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-447/egusphere-2023-447-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 21 Jun 2023
Dear reviewer,
I thank you for those precious comments. This will help improving the quality of this paper and I will include them in the next version.
Christophe
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-447-AC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 19 Sep 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 21 Jun 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-447', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Jul 2023
This manuscript reports on new 2-year long time series of atmospheric water vapor and precipitation isotopic composition measurements at Dumont d’Urville station, in Adelie Land. The authors provide diurnal and seasonal variations of meteorological parameters and isotopic compositions of atmospheric water vapor and precipitation, determine the relationships of delta 18O and temperature (humidity). Then, they evaluate the simulations from ECHAM6-wiso and quantify contributions of continental and oceanic grid cells to fit the observations. They also simulated delta 18O record in S1C1 firn core using temperature and precipitation from ERA5 or ECHAM6-wiso. They conclude that ECHAM6-wiso allows to better explain the delta 18O record in firn core than with the only influence of temperature.
Overall, the narrative of this manuscript is easy to follow, and the necessity of this study is well elaborated. The data analysis provides enough evidences for the conclusion. I would recommend the editor accept the manuscript after minor revision. I have following general comments:
- The abstract is a bit cursory without concision, and lacks some important conclusions. I would suggest the authors rewrite it.
- The description of the isotopic calibration is lacking detail and uncertainties. The plots of drift correction should be provided in SI. Delta 18O-humidity calibration data from SDM are missed in Fig. S2.
- The influence of synoptic events does not address very well. Some descriptions are not clear at seasonal or events scales. For instance, what is the difference of such events between winter and summer, and what is the reason for those distinct influences in L150-155? How could get the conclusion in L315-317?
- The evaluation of d-excess from ECHAM6-wiso is missing in section 3.2. The d-excess variability is well established from observations, but does not show any related analysis to combine with simulations. Why?
- I can not get the point clearly in L243-246. It seems controversial with the conclusion.
- Increase all font sizes in figures and figures are too small to see details.
- It is hard to compare the vapor data and precipitation data when they are plotted on separate panels with distinct axis scales in Fig. S9.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-447-RC2 - AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, 19 Sep 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
323 | 130 | 28 | 481 | 50 | 9 | 10 |
- HTML: 323
- PDF: 130
- XML: 28
- Total: 481
- Supplement: 50
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos
Elise Fourré
Cécile Agosta
Mathieu Casado
Alexandre Cauquoin
Martin Werner
Benedicte Minster
Frederic Prié
Olivier Jossoud
Leila Petit
Amaëlle Landais
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(11879 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2392 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper