the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
CFC-11 emissions are declining as expected in Western Europe
Abstract. Production and consumption of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane, CCl3F), CFC-12 dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl2F2) and CCl4 (carbon tetrachloride) are controlled under the regulations of the Montreal Protocol and have been phased out globally for dispersive use since 2010. Only CCl4 is still widely produced under exemption as a chemical feedstock (non-dispersive use). After 2010, emissions of CFC-11 and CFC-12 should therefore mostly originate from existing banks (e.g. foams and refrigerators), however evidence emerged of an increase in global emissions of CFC-11, which was in part attributed to eastern China. Emissions of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 have subsequently declined in this region, however the total global increase in CFC-11 was not fully accounted for. The motivation for this work was to assess the emissions of CFC-11 and the associated gases, CFC-12 and CCl4, from Western Europe. All countries in this region have been subject to the controls of the Montreal Protocol since the late 1980s, and, as non-Article-5 Parties, have been prohibited from producing CFCs and CCl4 for dispersive use since 1995. Four different inverse modelling systems are used to estimate emissions of these gases from 2008–2021 using data from four atmospheric measurement stations: Mace Head (Ireland), Jungfraujoch (Switzerland), Monte Cimone (Italy) and Tacolneston (UK). The average of the four model studies found that Western European emissions of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 between 2008 and 2021 were declining at 3.5 (2.7–4.8) %, 7.7 (6.3–8.0) % and 4.4 (2.6–6.4) % yr−1 respectively. Throughout this period, the highest CFC-11 emissions were in Northern France and Benelux (Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg). Emissions of CFC-12 co-located in this region were slightly higher than elsewhere in Western Europe, and also showed some enhancement of CCl4 emissions. However for CCl4, emissions were highest in the south of France. France had the highest emissions of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 over the period 2008–2021. Emissions from Western Europe (2008–2021) were on average 2.4 ± 0.4 Gg (CFC-11), 1.3 ± 0.3 Gg (CFC-12), 0.9 ± 0.2 Gg (CCl4). This study concludes that the emissions of CFC-11 from Northern France and Benelux are unlikely to be the result of new production. Our estimated decline in emissions of CFC-11 is consistent with a Western European bank release rate of 3.4 (2.6–4.5) %, which is in the upper half of the published range.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2201 KB)
-
Supplement
(3139 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2201 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3139 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', L. J. M. Kuijpers, 05 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Mar 2023
Review of “CFC-11 emissions are declining as expected in Western Europe “
This manuscript is well-written and the science discussed is very relevant to global atmospheric emissions, ozone loss and climate change. It also shows the importance of policy decisions to cut global emissions.
Major:
- I am not sure what you expect and whether you have seen those results from the analysis. This is not discussed anywhere in the text. Also, if you look at the results, there are some years with high emissions. This is also expected? Figure 5, for Benelux, there is a slight positive trend? Therefore, it is better to avoid ”expected” from the title. I do agree that there is a significant reduction in emissions.
- You have discussed CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 emissions, but the title says just CFC-11?
- “France also has the highest emissions per capita”, is it also holds good for the other countries mentioned here?
Minor:
Line 9: “, and ”
L10: from 2008 to 2021
L14: any reason for these highest regional emissions or are you talking about the slow decline there?
Abstract: The first 10 lines can be shortened
L40: all active banks are
L49: Is it bank or banks? be consistent in using this
L57: from 2012 to 2017 to understand
L58: In fact, they speculated that, and were not reporting
L106: “, respectively”
L261: any reason for this particular increase in specific years, e.g. 1995-1996?
L289: no single model particularly stands out?
L302: between 2008 and 2021
L304: which emitted less than that of
L308: as shown in Figure 3 panel (e)
Figure 5: Why Benelux shows an increase in the emission of CFC-11?
L341: To understand
Figure 1: font size is too small to read
Figure 4: colour bar is very bad, as there is a repetition of the same (very similar) colour. Please change this colour bar.
Figure 5: Any reason for the particular peaks? For instance, CFC-11 in 2010 in France and 2020 in Germany?
-----
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-40-RC2 -
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', Alison Redington, 04 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-40/egusphere-2023-40-AC1-supplement.pdf
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', L. J. M. Kuijpers, 05 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Mar 2023
Review of “CFC-11 emissions are declining as expected in Western Europe “
This manuscript is well-written and the science discussed is very relevant to global atmospheric emissions, ozone loss and climate change. It also shows the importance of policy decisions to cut global emissions.
Major:
- I am not sure what you expect and whether you have seen those results from the analysis. This is not discussed anywhere in the text. Also, if you look at the results, there are some years with high emissions. This is also expected? Figure 5, for Benelux, there is a slight positive trend? Therefore, it is better to avoid ”expected” from the title. I do agree that there is a significant reduction in emissions.
- You have discussed CFC-11, CFC-12 and CCl4 emissions, but the title says just CFC-11?
- “France also has the highest emissions per capita”, is it also holds good for the other countries mentioned here?
Minor:
Line 9: “, and ”
L10: from 2008 to 2021
L14: any reason for these highest regional emissions or are you talking about the slow decline there?
Abstract: The first 10 lines can be shortened
L40: all active banks are
L49: Is it bank or banks? be consistent in using this
L57: from 2012 to 2017 to understand
L58: In fact, they speculated that, and were not reporting
L106: “, respectively”
L261: any reason for this particular increase in specific years, e.g. 1995-1996?
L289: no single model particularly stands out?
L302: between 2008 and 2021
L304: which emitted less than that of
L308: as shown in Figure 3 panel (e)
Figure 5: Why Benelux shows an increase in the emission of CFC-11?
L341: To understand
Figure 1: font size is too small to read
Figure 4: colour bar is very bad, as there is a repetition of the same (very similar) colour. Please change this colour bar.
Figure 5: Any reason for the particular peaks? For instance, CFC-11 in 2010 in France and 2020 in Germany?
-----
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-40-RC2 -
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-40', Alison Redington, 04 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-40/egusphere-2023-40-AC1-supplement.pdf
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
328 | 113 | 16 | 457 | 38 | 5 | 7 |
- HTML: 328
- PDF: 113
- XML: 16
- Total: 457
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Alison L. Redington
Alistair J. Manning
Stephan Henne
Francesco Graziosi
Luke M. Western
Jgor Arduini
Anita L. Ganesan
Christina M. Harth
Michela Maione
Jens Mühle
Simon O'Doherty
Joseph Pitt
Stefan Reimann
Matthew Rigby
Peter K. Salameh
Peter G. Simmonds
T. Gerard Spain
Kieran Stanley
Martin K. Vollmer
Ray F. Weiss
Dickon Young
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2201 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3139 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper