Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2907
22 Dec 2023
 | 22 Dec 2023

Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the NASCENT campaign

Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo

Abstract. The Arctic is the fastest warming environment on Earth and the role of clouds in this warming is undisputed. The representation of Arctic clouds and their phase distribution, i.e. the amount of ice and supercooled water, influences predictions of future Arctic warming. Therefore, it is essential that cloud phase is correctly captured by models in order to accurately predict the future Arctic climate. Ice crystal formation in clouds happens through ice nucleation (primary ice production) and ice multiplication (secondary ice production). In common weather and climate models, rime-splintering is the only secondary ice production process included. In addition, prescribed number concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei or cloud droplets and ice-nucleating particles are often overestimated in Arctic environments by standard model configurations. This can lead to a misrepresentation of the phase distribution and precipitation formation in Arctic mixed-phase clouds, with important implications for the Arctic surface energy budget. During the Ny-Ålesund Aerosol Cloud Experiment (NASCENT) a holographic probe mounted on a tethered balloon took in-situ measurements of ice crystal and cloud droplet number and mass concentrations in Svalbard, Norway, during fall 2019 and spring 2020. In this study, we choose one case study from this campaign showing evidence of strong secondary ice production and use the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate it at a high vertical and spatial resolution. We test the performance of different microphysical parametrizations and apply a new state-of-the-art secondary ice parametrization. We find that the agreement with observations highly depends on the prescribed cloud condensation nuclei/cloud droplet and ice-nucleating particle concentration and requires an enhancement of secondary ice production processes. Lowering mass mixing ratio thresholds for rime splintering inside the Morrison microphysics scheme is crucial for enabling secondary ice production and thereby matching observations for the right reasons. The latter is a prerequisite for reliable simulations of Arctic mixed-phase cloud responses to future temperature- or aerosol perturbations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Jun 2024
Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the Ny-Ålesund Aerosol Cloud Experiment (NASCENT) campaign
Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Thérèse Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7179–7202, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7179-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7179-2024, 2024
Short summary
Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jan 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jan 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Britta Schäfer, 15 Mar 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jan 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jan 2024
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2907', Britta Schäfer, 15 Mar 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Britta Schäfer on behalf of the Authors (15 Mar 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (21 Mar 2024) by Aurélien Podglajen
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (17 Apr 2024)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (28 Apr 2024) by Aurélien Podglajen
AR by Britta Schäfer on behalf of the Authors (01 May 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (02 May 2024) by Aurélien Podglajen
AR by Britta Schäfer on behalf of the Authors (02 May 2024)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Jun 2024
Simulations of primary and secondary ice production during an Arctic mixed-phase cloud case from the Ny-Ålesund Aerosol Cloud Experiment (NASCENT) campaign
Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Thérèse Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7179–7202, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7179-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7179-2024, 2024
Short summary
Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo
Britta Schäfer, Robert Oscar David, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Julie Pasquier, Georgia Sotiropoulou, and Trude Storelvmo

Viewed

Total article views: 519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
371 121 27 519 21 17
  • HTML: 371
  • PDF: 121
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 519
  • BibTeX: 21
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Dec 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Dec 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 536 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 536 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Mixed-phase clouds, i.e. clouds consisting of both ice and supercooled water, are very common in the Arctic. However, how these clouds form is often not correctly represented in standard weather models. We show that both ice crystals concentrations in the cloud and precipitation from the cloud can be improved in the model, when aerosol concentrations are prescribed from observations and more processes for ice multiplication, i.e. the production if new ice particles from existing ice, are added.