the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A machine learning approach to the geomorphometric detection of ribbed moraines in Norway
Abstract. Machine learning is a powerful yet underutilised tool in geomorphology, commonly used for image–based pattern recognition. Analysing new high–resolution (1–10 m) elevation datasets, we investigate its usefulness for detecting discrete geomorphological features. This study develops a machine learning–based method for identifying ribbed moraines in digital elevation data and progresses to test its performance versus time consuming, manual methods. Ribbed moraines share geomorphometric characteristics with other glacial landforms, hence represent a valuable test of our new methodology in terms of differentiating between similar features, and wider for detection of landforms with similar characteristics. Furthermore, mapping ribbed moraines may provide valuable indications of their origin, a topic of debate within glacial geomorphology. To automatically detect ribbed moraines, we extract simple morphometrics from high–resolution digital elevation model data and mask regions where ribbed moraines are unlikely to form. We then test several machine learning algorithms before examining the best performer (K–means clustering) on three study areas in Norway of 15 km2. Our results demonstrate balanced accuracy of 65–75 % when validating versus ground–truth. The performance depends on the availability of high–resolution elevation data in Norway, needed to resolve the spatial scale of the target (10–100 m). We find the method effective at detecting both fields of ribbed moraines as well as individual ribbed moraines. We propose pathways for future implementation of this method on a large–scale and for increasing the detail of information gained about detected landforms. In conclusion, we demonstrate K–means clustering as a promising method for detecting ribbed moraines, with great potential to reduce the time needed to produce landform maps.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2089 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2089 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2430', Paul Dunlop, 12 Jan 2024
This is a very good contribution to geomorphological mapping of glacial terrain and in particular ribbed moraine which automated mapping approaches to date have overlooked. Whilst it is clearly not perfect, which is freely acknowledged by the authors, it also clearly represents a great step in the right direction towards developing a mapping approach is in my opinion badly needed, because mapping ribbed moraines over the large areas needed to test formational theories and reconstruct ice sheet sectors is extremely time consuming work. This approach, at least shows good results in areas where the terrain cover is mountainous and should work well in Norway and parts of Sweden. The mapping produced obviously needs cross checking and then editing as the overall accuracy is not high enough yet, but this is likely to be less time consuming that manual mapping of large ribbed moraine terrains that can contain 10s of thousands of individual ridges. I have some specific comments uploaded for the authors to consider.
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2430', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2024
I recommend this paper to be accepted in its present form. It is clearly written and describe subject quite well.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2430-RC2 -
AC1: 'Response to reviewers on egusphere-2023-2430', Thomas Barnes, 12 Apr 2024
Reviewer 2 – Anonymous – Thank you. We are extremely happy with your acceptance of this paper in an “as is” format. We will of course respond to the comments posed by reviewer 1.
Reviewer 1 – Paul Dunlop – Thank you for providing constructive and positive feedback on the manuscript, we greatly appreciate the guidance. Detailed responses to changes will be addressed below, and the manuscript will be adjusted accordingly. In taking account of the edits suggested by Reviewer 1, we have also updated the layout in part to account for new areas of white space thanks to the additional figure.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2430', Paul Dunlop, 12 Jan 2024
This is a very good contribution to geomorphological mapping of glacial terrain and in particular ribbed moraine which automated mapping approaches to date have overlooked. Whilst it is clearly not perfect, which is freely acknowledged by the authors, it also clearly represents a great step in the right direction towards developing a mapping approach is in my opinion badly needed, because mapping ribbed moraines over the large areas needed to test formational theories and reconstruct ice sheet sectors is extremely time consuming work. This approach, at least shows good results in areas where the terrain cover is mountainous and should work well in Norway and parts of Sweden. The mapping produced obviously needs cross checking and then editing as the overall accuracy is not high enough yet, but this is likely to be less time consuming that manual mapping of large ribbed moraine terrains that can contain 10s of thousands of individual ridges. I have some specific comments uploaded for the authors to consider.
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2430', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2024
I recommend this paper to be accepted in its present form. It is clearly written and describe subject quite well.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2430-RC2 -
AC1: 'Response to reviewers on egusphere-2023-2430', Thomas Barnes, 12 Apr 2024
Reviewer 2 – Anonymous – Thank you. We are extremely happy with your acceptance of this paper in an “as is” format. We will of course respond to the comments posed by reviewer 1.
Reviewer 1 – Paul Dunlop – Thank you for providing constructive and positive feedback on the manuscript, we greatly appreciate the guidance. Detailed responses to changes will be addressed below, and the manuscript will be adjusted accordingly. In taking account of the edits suggested by Reviewer 1, we have also updated the layout in part to account for new areas of white space thanks to the additional figure.
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
Aeteia/Ribbed-Moraine T. J. Barnes and S. Filhol https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7991094
Model code and software
Aeteia/Ribbed-Moraine T. J. Barnes and S. Filhol https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7991094
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
233 | 129 | 24 | 386 | 14 | 14 |
- HTML: 233
- PDF: 129
- XML: 24
- Total: 386
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Thomas James Barnes
Thomas Vikhamar Schuler
Simon Filhol
Karianne Staalesen Lilleøren
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2089 KB) - Metadata XML