the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparison of water-soluble and insoluble organic compositions attributing to different light absorption efficiency between residential coal and biomass burning emissions
Abstract. There are growing concerns about the climate impacts of absorbing organic carbon (also known as Brown Carbon, BrC) in the environment, however, the chemical composition and association with the light absorption ability of BrC remain poorly understood. In this study, focusing on one major source of BrC, water-soluble and water-insoluble organic carbon (WSOC; WISOC) from residential solid fuel combustions were characterized at the molecular level, and evaluated for their quantitative relationship with mass absorption efficiency (MAE). The MAE values at λ=365 nm from biomass burning were significantly higher than the coal combustion smokes. Thousands of peaks were identified in the m/z range of 150–800, with the most intense ion peaks of 200–500 m/z for WSOC and 600–800 m/z for WISOC, respectively. CHO group was the most abundant component in the WSOC extracts from biomass burning emissions compared to coals; while sulfur-containing compounds (CHOS+CHONS, SOCs) were more intense in the WISOC extracts, especially in coal emissions. Emissions of the CHON group were positively correlated with the fuel N content (r=0.936, p<0.05), which explained higher CHON emissions in coal emissions compared to biomass burning emissions. The SOCs emissions were more predominant in flaming phases, as seen from a positive correlation between SOCs and modified combustion efficiency (MCE) (r=0.750, p<0.05). The unique formulas of coal combustion aerosols were in the lower H/C and O/C regions with higher unsaturated compounds in the van Krevelen (VK) diagram. In WISOC extracts, coal combustion emissions had significantly high fractions of condensed aromatics (32–59 %) which was only 4.3–9.7 % in biomass burning emissions. The CHOS group in biomass burning emissions was characterized by larger condensed aromatic compound fractions compared to coal combustion. The CHOS aromatic compounds fractions were positively correlated with MAE values, in both WSOC (r=0.714, p<0.05) and WISOC extracts (r=0.929, p<0.001), suggesting the abundance of CHOS aromatic compounds explained MAE variabilities across the different fuels.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2952 KB)
-
Supplement
(4377 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2952 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4377 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2417', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Mar 2024
In this paper, focusing on one major source of BrC, water-soluble(WSOC) and water-insoluble organic carbon (WISOC) from residential solid fuel combustions were characterized by FT-ICR MS, and evaluated for their quantitative relationship with mass absorption efficiency (MAE).
I think the paper is well and clearly written and the experimental and analytical components sound. More minor comments with some requests for clarification on the annotated pdf attached.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lu Zhang, 16 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2417', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Apr 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lu Zhang, 16 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2417', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Mar 2024
In this paper, focusing on one major source of BrC, water-soluble(WSOC) and water-insoluble organic carbon (WISOC) from residential solid fuel combustions were characterized by FT-ICR MS, and evaluated for their quantitative relationship with mass absorption efficiency (MAE).
I think the paper is well and clearly written and the experimental and analytical components sound. More minor comments with some requests for clarification on the annotated pdf attached.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lu Zhang, 16 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2417', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Apr 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lu Zhang, 16 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
248 | 67 | 20 | 335 | 30 | 14 | 9 |
- HTML: 248
- PDF: 67
- XML: 20
- Total: 335
- Supplement: 30
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Lu Zhang
Jin Li
Yaojie Li
Xinlei Liu
Zhihan Luo
Shu Tao
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2952 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4377 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper