the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Accurate Assessment of Land-Atmosphere Coupling in Climate Models Requires High Frequency Data Output
Kirsten L. Findell
Eunkyo Seo
Paul A. Dirmeyer
Nathan P. Arnold
Nathaniel Chaney
Megan D. Fowler
Meng Huang
David M. Lawrence
Po-Lun Ma
Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Abstract. Land-atmosphere (L-A) interactions are important for understanding convective processes, climate feedbacks, the development and perpetuation of droughts, heatwaves, pluvials, and other land-centred climate anomalies. Local L-A coupling (LoCo) metrics capture relevant L-A processes, highlighting the impact of soil and vegetation states on surface flux partitioning, and the impact of surface fluxes on boundary layer (BL) growth, development, and entrainment of air above the BL. A primary goal of the Climate Process Team on Coupling Land and Atmospheric Subgrid Parameterizations (CLASP) is parameterizing and characterizing the impact of subgrid heterogeneity in global and regional earth system models (ESMs) to improve the connection between land and atmospheric states and processes. A critical step in achieving that aim is the incorporation of L-A metrics, especially LoCo metrics, into climate model diagnostic process streams. However, because land-atmosphere interactions span time scales of minutes (e.g., turbulent fluxes), hours (e.g., BL growth and decay), days (e.g., soil moisture memory), and seasons (e.g., variability of behavioural regimes between soil moisture and latent heat flux), with multiple processes of interest happening in different geographic regions at different times of year, there is not a single metric that captures all the modes, means, and methods of interaction between the land and the atmosphere. And while monthly means of most of the LoCo-relevant variables are routinely saved from ESM simulations, data storage constraints typically preclude routine archival of the hourly data that would enable the calculation of all LoCo metrics.
Here we outline a reasonable data request that would allow for adequate characterization of sub-daily coupling processes between the land and the atmosphere, preserving enough sub-daily output to describe, analyse, and better understand L-A coupling in modern climate models. A secondary request involves embedding calculations within the models to determine mean properties in and above the BL to further improve characterization of model behaviour. Higher-frequency model output will (i) allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant time scales, (ii) enable demonstration of inter-model spread in L-A coupling processes, and (iii) aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
- Preprint
(2690 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(334 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Kirsten L. Findell et al.
Status: open (until 27 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-2048', Divyansh Chug, 30 Nov 2023
reply
Peer-review
 Accurate Assessment of Land-Atmosphere Coupling in Climate Models Requires High Frequency Data Output
by Kirsten Findell et al.
Â
This study outlines a practical data request that would allow climate model developers, users and educators to adequately characterize (and diagnose the shortcomings of) the sub-daily coupling processes between the land and the atmosphere, in their numerical model of choice. Typically, climate model outputs have enabled such characterization through monthly mean (or in some case, daily mean) data which is inadequate the capture land-atmosphere (L-A) interaction processes, specifically related to daytime boundary layer development. The clear outline provided in this paper on the specific variables, temporal resolution, and length of dataset required for L-A coupling diagnosis, using the Local L-A Coupling (LoCo) framework, offers a consistent guideline for the research community. The authors have provided multiple use-cases that illustrate the utility of their request. It’s clear that they have carefully optimized the request with regards to the marginal storage space and effort needed to perform this additional task.
The claims made by the authors in this research article are as follows:- No single metric currently in practice captures all the modes, means, and methods of interaction between the land and the atmosphere.
- The typical resolution of Earth System Model output (daily; or 6-hourly at best) is insufficient for characterizing model behavior for important sub-daily processes captured by the LoCo metrics.
- Higher-frequency model output is needed to ensure model fidelity, robustness and further development.
This paper builds on the previous literature (with some additional and modified concepts) summarized by Santanello et al. (2018). It provides helpful considerations on how to apply and interpret the coupling metrics based on the temporal resolution of the dataset. Unlike previous efforts, this work provides a clear outline for the ingredients required to effectively perform this task (of characterizing L-A interactions). This is a significant stride toward standardizing the analysis and diagnosis of model behavior relevant for the L-A interactions research community, specifically for those whose research can benefit from the LoCo metrics. I found zero inconsistencies or flaws in the manuscript. As such, this manuscript merits publication as is.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2048-RC1 -
RC2: 'Peer Review', Timothy Lahmers, 02 Dec 2023
reply
This data-request provides a valuable addition to the discipline by outlining existing PBL knowledge and discussing current limitations of existing datasets, given their temporal resolution and missing values. This research is especially relevant in a changing climate, and the authors note that this work is relevant to the understanding of hot/dry extremes, as well as wet extremes.
The authors do a good job outlining the need for higher temporal resolution, considering this in terms of physical processes and variability through the diurnal cycle, and they consider this using the Mixing Diagram framework, to show the limitations of coarser data.
While this manuscript will be an important contribution, I have some technical and structural concerns for the authors:
- While the authors are careful to address the precise needs for different levels of temporal resolution in their data-request, there is little information about spatial resolution. Since PBL processes occur on the scale of meters to the meso-beta scale, this request would be stronger with more details on the spatial scale of the data required.
- Related to this above point, the authors note that a request for 1-degree spatial resolution data would require 13 GB per year (lines 350 to 354). Is 1-degree spatial resolution appropriate, given that it is now coarser than most global models and would likely be unable to capture most mesoscale processes (e.g., individual thunderstorms and surface gradients across fronts)? Would this resolution be sufficient to resolve PBL process or is a higher resolution required?
- Figure 2 is a useful conceptual illustration for the reader to evaluate PBL linkages for model simulations compared to observations; however, the blue dashed lines are difficult to see. Could the authors update this figure to make this component more legible?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2048-RC2
Kirsten L. Findell et al.
Kirsten L. Findell et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
170 | 72 | 10 | 252 | 15 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 170
- PDF: 72
- XML: 10
- Total: 252
- Supplement: 15
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1