the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A global fuel characteristic model and dataset for wildfire prediction
Joe Ramu McNorton
Francesca Di Giuseppe
Abstract. Effective wildfire management and prevention strategies depend on accurate forecasts of fire occurrence and propagation. Fuel load and fuel moisture content are essential variables for forecasting fire occurrence and whilst existing operational systems incorporate dead fuel moisture content, both live fuel moisture content and fuel load are either approximated or neglected. We propose a mid-complexity model combining data driven and analytical methods to predict fuel characteristics. The model can be integrated into Earth-System models to provide real-time forecasts and climate records taking advantage of meteorological variables, land surface modelling and satellite observations. Fuel load and moisture is partitioned into live and dead fuels, including both wood and foliage components. As an example, we have generated a 10-year dataset which is well correlated with independent data and largely explains observed fire activity globally. While dead fuel moisture correlates highest with fire activity, live fuel moisture and load are shown to potentially enhance prediction skill. The use of observation data to inform a dynamical model is a crucial first step toward disentangling the contributing factors of fuel and weather to understand fire evolution globally. This dataset, with high spatiotemporal resolution (~9 km, daily), is the first of its kind and will be regularly updated.
- Preprint
(3596 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(417 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Joe Ramu McNorton and Francesca Di Giuseppe
Status: open (until 04 Nov 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1984', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2023
reply
This work presents a model that is capable of predicting fuel characteristics. Fuel load and moisture is divided into live and dead fuels, and also includes wood and foliage components. One of the main outcomes of this work is a dataset of these variables on a daily scale and at ~9 kilometer spatial resolution. Overall, I found this work to be original and a much-needed contribution to the science.
However, I believe the manuscript may be improved if the following changes are made:
Lines 130-140: Didn’t understand what SW_live represented fully. May you please elaborate on what “the remaining component of live wood” means?
Line 156: Should this be +4.6 Pg yr-1 based on the numbers presented?
Section 2.2: Is it possible to add a table that summarizes everything outlined here? While it is well-written, I feel that the density of information is quite high and may benefit through using a table to organize all the numbers and where they come from.
Figure 6: Great figure! I would suggest placing the text at the top of each panel so the text is not in the way of the figure.
Figure 8: Same comment as Figure 6 (text is a bit hard to read in the bottom four panels).
Figure 9: Same comment as Figure 6 (text is a bit hard to read in the bottom two panels).
Figure 10: Same comment as Figure 6.
Figure 11: Same comment as Figure 6.
Figure 12: Would it be possible to increase the font size of the names and numbers along the x-axis and y-axis? Also for the legends? I found these figure panels a bit difficult to read due to small size.
Figure 13: Same comment as Figure 12.
I have also added some of my edits/comments as a track changes document in the supplement file.
After these changes are made, I believe this manuscript may be accepted for publication.
Joe Ramu McNorton and Francesca Di Giuseppe
Joe Ramu McNorton and Francesca Di Giuseppe
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
116 | 50 | 6 | 172 | 14 | 2 | 4 |
- HTML: 116
- PDF: 50
- XML: 6
- Total: 172
- Supplement: 14
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1