the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Phase state and viscosity of secondary organic aerosols over China simulated by WRF-Chem
Abstract. Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) can exist in liquid, semi-solid or amorphous solid states, which are rarely accounted for in current chemical transport models (CTMs). Missing the information of SOA phase state and viscosity in CTMs impedes accurate representation of SOA formation and evolution, affecting the predictions of aerosol effects on air quality and climate. We have previously developed a method to estimate the glass transition temperature (Tg) of an organic compound based on volatility. In this study, we apply this method to predict the phase state and viscosity of SOA particles over China in summer of 2018 using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled to Chemistry (WRF-Chem). This is the first time that spatial distributions of the SOA phase state over China are investigated by a regional CTM. Simulations show that Tg values of dry SOA range from ~287 K to 305 K, with higher values in the northwestern China where SOA particles have larger mass fractions of low volatility compounds. Considering water uptake by SOA particles, the SOA viscosity also shows a prominent geospatial gradient that highly viscous or solid SOA particles are mainly found in the northwestern China. The lowest and highest SOA viscosity values both occur over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau that the solid phase state is predicted over dry and high-altitude areas and the liquid phase state is predicted mainly in the south of the plateau with high relative humidity during the summer monsoon season. The characteristic mixing timescale of organic molecules in 200 nm SOA particles is calculated based on the simulated particle viscosity and the bulk diffusion coefficient of organic molecules. Calculations show that during the simulated period the percent time of the mixing timescale longer than 1 h is > 70 % at the surface and at 500 hPa in most areas of the northern China, indicating that kinetic partitioning considering the bulk diffusion in viscous particles may be required for more accurate prediction of SOA mass concentrations and size distributions over these areas. Sensitivity simulations show that including the formation of extremely low-volatile organic compounds, the percent time that a SOA particle is in the liquid phase state decreases by up to 12 % in the southeastern China during the simulated period. With an assumption that the organic and inorganic compounds are always internally mixed in one phase, we show that the water absorbed by inorganic species can significantly lower the simulated viscosity over the southeastern China. This indicates that constraining the uncertainties in simulated SOA volatility distributions and accurately predicting the occurrence of phase separation would improve prediction of viscosity in multicomponent particles in southeastern China.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2264 KB)
-
Supplement
(1976 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2264 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1976 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1444', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2023
#1: The authors claim that they are the first to investigate the spatial distributions of the SOA phase state over China by a regional CTM. But what about the model being applied to other parts of the world and has the authors looked into those applications and how does it differs from application of the regional CTM in those areas as compared to China?
#2: I don't know if I am missing something, but I could not find Fig. S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7 and Table S1, S2 which are referred to throughout the manuscript.
#3: In general the figures are mostly contour plots of different parameters. A more analytical presentation of the results from the model is missing in the current form of the manuscript. The authors may try to add some statistical figures or tables in order to analyze the outcomes from the model.
#4: The conclusion section seems to be lengthy. May be the authors can think about making a separate discussions section and the conclusion section.
Specific Comment:
#5: Page 3 Line 63: What is "semi-sold"?
#6: Page 3 Line 76: Reference missing year "Maclean et al.".
#7: Page 4 Line 107: Â What is the "outer domain" considered here?
#8: Page 4 lIne 115: "39 nm to 10 μm". it would be nice to use any one of units, either nm or μm.
#9: Page 9 Line 271 and Line 274: What does the author mean here by "Our previous global simulations"? Please provide proper reference.
#10: Page 10 Line 295: "(see the Method)". What "method" is referred to here?
#11: Page 10 Line 297: "The highest value is ~10–5 cm2 s–1 occurring in liquid SOA particles in the southern Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 6a).". Why is the highest value being observed at the southern Tibetan Plateau? Can the authors provide a probable reasoning for this observation?
#12: Figure 2: Figure 2g is a bit difficult to read. May be the authors can try having a different color scales for SOAX, SOA1, SOA2, SOA3 and SOA4.
#13: Figure 3: The vertical profiles of mixing timescales for organic molecules within 200 nm SOA particles at IAP site as
shown in Figure 3b seems to be more sensitive to altitude than the SOA viscosity whichis shown in Figure 3a. Can the authors provide a reasoning for this behaviour?#14: The colorbar used in figure 8a from -45 to 45 K. But in the contour plot I can only see the values above 0 or -5. Is it possible to make these colorbar a bit more according to the range of values so as to see the variation more clearly? Same for Figure  8b and Figure 9.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1444-RC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Dec 2023
1.I am interested in the content of this paper and very concerned about the research results. From the perspective of scientific significance, I support the publication of this paper. However, reading this paper is very difficult, and I suggest adjusting the paper to highlight the main theme.
2.Firstly, I hope to see a clear conclusion. It feels like the paper ends in the midst of discussion. Please clarify the conclusion of the paper in the revised manuscript. If there is more to discuss, please use a separate subsection for that discussion.
3.The theme of the paper is not sufficiently clear, and there is a discrepancy between the focus of the conclusions in the conclusion section and those in the abstract. It is unclear what your main focus is. Please clarify your focus and then revise the paper accordingly, making choices about what to include. For instance, you might consider relocating some figures from the main body of the paper to the appendix, and vice versa.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1444-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1444/egusphere-2023-1444-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1444/egusphere-2023-1444-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Dec 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1444', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2023
#1: The authors claim that they are the first to investigate the spatial distributions of the SOA phase state over China by a regional CTM. But what about the model being applied to other parts of the world and has the authors looked into those applications and how does it differs from application of the regional CTM in those areas as compared to China?
#2: I don't know if I am missing something, but I could not find Fig. S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7 and Table S1, S2 which are referred to throughout the manuscript.
#3: In general the figures are mostly contour plots of different parameters. A more analytical presentation of the results from the model is missing in the current form of the manuscript. The authors may try to add some statistical figures or tables in order to analyze the outcomes from the model.
#4: The conclusion section seems to be lengthy. May be the authors can think about making a separate discussions section and the conclusion section.
Specific Comment:
#5: Page 3 Line 63: What is "semi-sold"?
#6: Page 3 Line 76: Reference missing year "Maclean et al.".
#7: Page 4 Line 107: Â What is the "outer domain" considered here?
#8: Page 4 lIne 115: "39 nm to 10 μm". it would be nice to use any one of units, either nm or μm.
#9: Page 9 Line 271 and Line 274: What does the author mean here by "Our previous global simulations"? Please provide proper reference.
#10: Page 10 Line 295: "(see the Method)". What "method" is referred to here?
#11: Page 10 Line 297: "The highest value is ~10–5 cm2 s–1 occurring in liquid SOA particles in the southern Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 6a).". Why is the highest value being observed at the southern Tibetan Plateau? Can the authors provide a probable reasoning for this observation?
#12: Figure 2: Figure 2g is a bit difficult to read. May be the authors can try having a different color scales for SOAX, SOA1, SOA2, SOA3 and SOA4.
#13: Figure 3: The vertical profiles of mixing timescales for organic molecules within 200 nm SOA particles at IAP site as
shown in Figure 3b seems to be more sensitive to altitude than the SOA viscosity whichis shown in Figure 3a. Can the authors provide a reasoning for this behaviour?#14: The colorbar used in figure 8a from -45 to 45 K. But in the contour plot I can only see the values above 0 or -5. Is it possible to make these colorbar a bit more according to the range of values so as to see the variation more clearly? Same for Figure  8b and Figure 9.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1444-RC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Dec 2023
1.I am interested in the content of this paper and very concerned about the research results. From the perspective of scientific significance, I support the publication of this paper. However, reading this paper is very difficult, and I suggest adjusting the paper to highlight the main theme.
2.Firstly, I hope to see a clear conclusion. It feels like the paper ends in the midst of discussion. Please clarify the conclusion of the paper in the revised manuscript. If there is more to discuss, please use a separate subsection for that discussion.
3.The theme of the paper is not sufficiently clear, and there is a discrepancy between the focus of the conclusions in the conclusion section and those in the abstract. It is unclear what your main focus is. Please clarify your focus and then revise the paper accordingly, making choices about what to include. For instance, you might consider relocating some figures from the main body of the paper to the appendix, and vice versa.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1444-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1444/egusphere-2023-1444-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ying Li, 23 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1444/egusphere-2023-1444-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Dec 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
536 | 199 | 28 | 763 | 68 | 17 | 23 |
- HTML: 536
- PDF: 199
- XML: 28
- Total: 763
- Supplement: 68
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Zhiqiang Zhang
Haiyan Ran
Junling An
Yu Qu
Weiqi Xu
Weiwei Hu
Hongbin Xie
Zifa Wang
Manabu Shiraiwa
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2264 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1976 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper