Scaling between volume and runout of rock avalanches explained by a modified Voellmy rheology
Abstract. Rock avalanches reach considerably greater runout lengths than predicted by Coulomb friction. While it has been known for a long time that runout length increases with volume, explaining the increase qualitatively is still a challenge. In this study, the widely used Voellmy rheology is reinterpreted and modified. Instead of adding a Coulomb friction term and a velocity-dependent term, the modified rheology assigns the two terms to different regimes of velocity. While assuming a transition between Coulomb friction and flow at a given velocity is the simplest approach, a reinterpretation of an existing model for the kinetic energy of random particle motion predicts a dependence of the crossover velocity on the thickness of the rock avalanche. Analytical solutions for a lumped mass on a simple 1-D topography reveal the existence of a slope-dominated and a height-dominated regime within the regime of flow. In the slope-dominated regime, the kinetic energy at the foot of the slope depends mainly on the slope angle, while the absolute height relative to the valley floor has little effect, and vice versa. Both regimes can be distinguished by the ratio of a length scale derived from the rheology and the length scale of the topography. Long runout occurs in the height-dominated regime. In combination with empirical relations between volume, thickness, and height, the approach based on the random kinetic energy model reproduces the scaling of runout length with volume observed in nature very well.
Status: open (until 06 Jul 2023)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-144', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Mar 2023 reply
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-144', Matthias Rauter, 20 May 2023 reply
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Paper is definitely interesting, but for me (i'm geologist) it was difficult to flollow. the explanation.
It would be really useful if you will add a list of all parameters used in the equations with all these quantities dimensions and their physical meaning (may be a schematic cross-section). It will help a lot to readers from the geological community to follow your explanations.
Some comments are in the attached file.