the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global dryland aridity changes indicated by atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation observations at meteorological stations
Haiyang Shi
Geping Luo
Olaf Hellwich
Xiufeng He
Alishir Kurban
Philippe De Maeyer
Tim Van de Voorde
Abstract. In the context of global warming, an increase in atmospheric aridity and global dryland expansion were expected under the future climate in previous studies. However, it conflicts with observed greening over drylands and the insignificant increase in hydrological and ecological aridity from the ecohydrology perspective. Combining climatic, hydrological, and vegetation data, this study evaluated global dryland aridity changes at meteorological sites from 2003 to 2019. A decoupling between atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation aridity was found. Atmospheric aridity represented by the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) increased, hydrological aridity indicated by machine learning-based precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P-ET) data did not change significantly, and ecological aridity represented by leaf area index (LAI) decreased. P-ET showed non-significant changes in most of the dominant combinations of VPD, LAI, and P-ET. This study highlights the added values of using station scale data to assess dryland change as a complement to the results based on coarse resolution reanalysis data and land surface models.
- Preprint
(2229 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Haiyang Shi et al.
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1187', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Aug 2023
reply
The authors evaluated global changes in dryland aridity using data from meteorological sites during 2003-2019, with the goal of reducing scale-related uncertainty. They obtained a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted characteristics of these changes and identified a decoupling between atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation aridity. The manuscript is well-written, and the results are intriguing.
Some specific points:
- Method: the scale mismatch between the site observations and the gridded data used in the RF model may introduce uncertainty. The authors may want to consider addressing this uncertainty in their modeling practice, or at the very least, discuss it in Section 4.
- Figure 2(a): why is the performance of one site exceptionally poor with a negative correlation (Rcorr<0)?
- Figure 3: the Antarctic continent could be omitted from the figure to enhance the clarity of the focal information.
- Lines 28-33 and Lines 279-283: the content provided is repetitive. Please rephrase and avoid redundancy.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1187-RC1
Haiyang Shi et al.
Haiyang Shi et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
302 | 63 | 12 | 377 | 7 | 8 |
- HTML: 302
- PDF: 63
- XML: 12
- Total: 377
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1