the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
| 05 Jun 2023
Boundary of nighttime ozone chemical equilibrium in the mesopause region: long-term evolution from 20-year satellite observations
Abstract. The assumption of nighttime ozone chemical equilibrium (NOCE) is widely used for retrieval of the Оx-НOx components in the mesopause from rocket and satellite measurements. In this work, recently developed analytical criterion of determining the NOCE boundary is applied (1) to study of connection of this boundary with O and H spatiotemporal variability basing on the 3D chemical transport modeling, and (2) to retrieve and analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of the NOCE boundary in 2002–2021 from SABER/TIMED data set. It was revealed, first, that the NOCE boundary well reproduces the transition zone dividing deep and weak diurnal oscillations of O and H at the low and middle latitudes. Second, the NOCE boundary is sensitive to sporadic abrupt changes in the middle atmosphere dynamics, in particular, due to powerful sudden stratospheric warmings leading to events of elevated (up to ~80 km) stratopause, which took place in January–February 2004, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2018 and 2019. Third, the space-time evolution of this characteristics expressed via pressure-height contains a clear signal of 11-year solar cycle in the range of 55º S–55º N. In particular, average annual the NOCE boundary averaged in this range of latitudes anticorrelates well with F10.7 index with the coefficient of -0.96. Moreover, it shows a weak linear trend of 49.2±36.2 m/decade.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(9607 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(9607 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1046', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jun 2023
Review report on the scientific article "Boundary of nighttime ozone chemical equilibrium in the mesopause region: long term evolution from 20-year satellite observations" by Kulikov et al.
The airglow measurements are used to determine atomic oxygen and atomic hydrogen, which are very difficult to measure by other methods. Number of investigations of minor chemical constituent distributions in mesopause are based on the assumption about photochemical equilibrium of ozone. Thus, solid knowledge on the spatial-temporal distributions of ozone photochemical equilibrium are desirable.
Main idea of the paper is to study the relation of ozone photochemical equilibrium boundary with O and H spatio-temporal variability basing on the 3D chemical transport. Moreover, authors propose investigation the spatio-temporal evolution of the ozone photochemical equilibrium boundary in 2002-2021 from SABER/TIMED data.
The research is scientifically valuable. The theoretical part is presented in the paper very convincingly. The methods and approaches are correct. On my opinion this work bring deep insights on chemistry of MLT region and knowledge essential for measurements. On my opinion it should be accepted in ACP after minor revision.
Comments.
- The title does not accurately reflect the essence of what has been done in this article. One might get the impression that the equilibrium boundary was taken from satellite data. In reality, this characteristic was found using SABER data. Should be corrected, for example: "...: long-term evolution of the boundary determined (OR derived) using 20-year satellite observations".
- I would like to note that the nighttime ozone equilibrium boundary was investigated in previous papers of the authors using 3D MLT modelling. There the criterion was also proposed, which in this work is applied to determine the altitude position of this boundary, using already the data of real measurements. It is well known that any model is an idealized representation of the real reality and, in principle, may not take into account some important features of the natural object, poorly formulated mathematically. In this regard, a very important question that needs to be clarified at least in the discussion. Can the authors present any other indications of the nighttime ozone equilibrium boundary in the SABER profiles or in the O and H profiles reconstructed from these data?
- There are quite a large number of figures (20) with different number of panels (from 1 to 20) in the article with a relatively small volume of text. For better structuring of the article, some of the figures should be omitted or merged, for example: (4, 8, 13 and 17), (6 and 15), (7 and 16), (10, 12, 19 and 20).
- Figures 1-3 show variations of O and H normalised to some mean daily values. It is not clear what these values are. If these are averages over the entire range of altitudes, then the figures should show known maximums of O and H, but this is not present in the figures. Apparently different daily average O and H values were used for each altitude. Please clarify this issue. Also, the figures show white spots where the normalised concentrations appear to fall below 10-6. Apparently the range of variation shown needs to be increased.
- Lines 315-317. The authors write "Basing on daytime O and H distributions in the mesopause region obtained in Kulikov et al. (2022), we calculated O/H in summer and winter." It would be nice to provide figures, which confirm that "this ratio at middle latitudes is remarkably less than in winter".
- I have my doubts that quite a few of the many instances in which the articles are mentioned correctly. Furthermore, there are a number of questions about the use of English expressions. Therefore I strongly recommend checking the text of the article with the help of a professional translator.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1046-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1046', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1046', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jun 2023
Review report on the scientific article "Boundary of nighttime ozone chemical equilibrium in the mesopause region: long term evolution from 20-year satellite observations" by Kulikov et al.
The airglow measurements are used to determine atomic oxygen and atomic hydrogen, which are very difficult to measure by other methods. Number of investigations of minor chemical constituent distributions in mesopause are based on the assumption about photochemical equilibrium of ozone. Thus, solid knowledge on the spatial-temporal distributions of ozone photochemical equilibrium are desirable.
Main idea of the paper is to study the relation of ozone photochemical equilibrium boundary with O and H spatio-temporal variability basing on the 3D chemical transport. Moreover, authors propose investigation the spatio-temporal evolution of the ozone photochemical equilibrium boundary in 2002-2021 from SABER/TIMED data.
The research is scientifically valuable. The theoretical part is presented in the paper very convincingly. The methods and approaches are correct. On my opinion this work bring deep insights on chemistry of MLT region and knowledge essential for measurements. On my opinion it should be accepted in ACP after minor revision.
Comments.
- The title does not accurately reflect the essence of what has been done in this article. One might get the impression that the equilibrium boundary was taken from satellite data. In reality, this characteristic was found using SABER data. Should be corrected, for example: "...: long-term evolution of the boundary determined (OR derived) using 20-year satellite observations".
- I would like to note that the nighttime ozone equilibrium boundary was investigated in previous papers of the authors using 3D MLT modelling. There the criterion was also proposed, which in this work is applied to determine the altitude position of this boundary, using already the data of real measurements. It is well known that any model is an idealized representation of the real reality and, in principle, may not take into account some important features of the natural object, poorly formulated mathematically. In this regard, a very important question that needs to be clarified at least in the discussion. Can the authors present any other indications of the nighttime ozone equilibrium boundary in the SABER profiles or in the O and H profiles reconstructed from these data?
- There are quite a large number of figures (20) with different number of panels (from 1 to 20) in the article with a relatively small volume of text. For better structuring of the article, some of the figures should be omitted or merged, for example: (4, 8, 13 and 17), (6 and 15), (7 and 16), (10, 12, 19 and 20).
- Figures 1-3 show variations of O and H normalised to some mean daily values. It is not clear what these values are. If these are averages over the entire range of altitudes, then the figures should show known maximums of O and H, but this is not present in the figures. Apparently different daily average O and H values were used for each altitude. Please clarify this issue. Also, the figures show white spots where the normalised concentrations appear to fall below 10-6. Apparently the range of variation shown needs to be increased.
- Lines 315-317. The authors write "Basing on daytime O and H distributions in the mesopause region obtained in Kulikov et al. (2022), we calculated O/H in summer and winter." It would be nice to provide figures, which confirm that "this ratio at middle latitudes is remarkably less than in winter".
- I have my doubts that quite a few of the many instances in which the articles are mentioned correctly. Furthermore, there are a number of questions about the use of English expressions. Therefore I strongly recommend checking the text of the article with the help of a professional translator.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1046-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1046', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1046/egusphere-2023-1046-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mikhail Kulikov, 24 Sep 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224 | 66 | 23 | 313 | 8 | 10 |
- HTML: 224
- PDF: 66
- XML: 23
- Total: 313
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Mikhail Yu. Kulikov
Mikhail V. Belikovich
Aleksey G. Chubarov
Svetlana O. Dementyeva
Alexander M. Feigin
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(9607 KB) - Metadata XML