the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How far can the error estimation problem in data assimilation be closed by collocated data?
Abstract. Accurate specification of error statistics required for data assimilation remains an ongoing challenge, partly because their estimation is an ill-posed problem that requires statistical assumptions. Even with the common assumption that background and observation errors are uncorrelated, the problem remains underdetermined. One natural question that could arise is: Can the increasing amount of overlapping observations or other datasets help to reduce the total number of statistical assumptions, or do they introduce more statistical unknowns? In order to answer this question, this paper provides a conceptual view on the statistical error estimation problem for multiple collocated datasets, including a generalized mathematical formulation, an exemplary demonstration with synthetic data as well as a formulation of the minimal and optimal conditions to solve the problem. It is demonstrated that the required number of statistical assumptions increases linearly with the number of datasets. However the number of error statistics that can be estimated increases quadratically, allowing for an estimation of an increasing number of error cross-statistics between datasets for more than three datasets. The presented optimal estimation of full error covariance and cross-covariance matrices between dataset does not accumulate uncertainties of assumptions among estimations of subsequent error statistics.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2189 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2189 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Ricardo Todling, 09 Nov 2022
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Nov 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Olivier Talagrand, 19 Dec 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-EC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
We thank the editor for the suggestions. We provide a detailed response to each of the referees separately and prepared a revised version of the manuscript. We hope that we could reply and adopt the manuscript in a sufficient way. In case of remaining questions or suggestions, we are open for further discussions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-996-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Ricardo Todling, 09 Nov 2022
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Nov 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-996', Olivier Talagrand, 19 Dec 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-996/egusphere-2022-996-EC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
We thank the editor for the suggestions. We provide a detailed response to each of the referees separately and prepared a revised version of the manuscript. We hope that we could reply and adopt the manuscript in a sufficient way. In case of remaining questions or suggestions, we are open for further discussions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-996-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Annika Vogel, 17 Jan 2023
Peer review completion
Post-review adjustments
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
361 | 150 | 16 | 527 | 8 | 5 |
- HTML: 361
- PDF: 150
- XML: 16
- Total: 527
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Richard Ménard
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2189 KB) - Metadata XML