Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-921
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-921
 
20 Sep 2022
20 Sep 2022
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

What drives Fyw variations with elevation in Alpine catchments?

Alessio Gentile1, Davide Canone1, Natalie Ceperley4, Davide Gisolo1, Maurizio Previati1, Giulia Zuecco3, Bettina Schaefli2,4, and Stefano Ferraris1 Alessio Gentile et al.
  • 1Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico and Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
  • 2Institute of Earth Surface Dynamic (IDYST), Faculty of Geosciences and Environment (FGSE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 3Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy
  • 4Institute of Geography (GIUB) and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract. The young water fraction (Fyw), defined as the fraction of catchment outflow with transit times of less than about 2–3 months, is increasingly used in hydrological studies, replacing the widely used Mean Transit Time (MTT), which is subject to aggregation error. The use of this new metric in catchment intercomparison studies is helpful to understand and conceptualize the relevant processes controlling catchment’s hydrological function. Past work has shown the remarkable and counterintuitive evidence that steep (and generally high elevation) catchments worldwide reveal small Fyw values. However, the topographic slope only partially explains the observed Fyw variance, and the mechanisms hidden behind this lowering with slope remain basically unclear.

The main aim of this paper is to investigate what drives Fyw variations with elevation in Alpine catchments clarifying why Fyw is low at high altitudes. In this regard, we use a dataset composed of 27 study catchments, located both in Switzerland and in Italy, that we categorize as rainfall-dominated, hybrid or snow-dominated according to a proposed formal classification scheme that considers both a common-used monthly streamflow ratio and the snow cover regime. We analyze three not previously investigated variables that could potentially explain the Fyw elevation gradients: the fractional snow cover area (FSCA), the fraction of quaternary deposits (Fqd), and the fraction of baseflow (Fbf). We also consider a fourth variable, namely the Winter Flow Index (WFI), for comparing our results about the groundwater contribution to streamflow with those of previous scientific publications.

Our results suggest that unconsolidated sediments could play a role in modulating Fyw elevation gradients via their capacity to store groundwater, but further geological information, such as the portion of fractured bedrocks, would be desirable for a complete picture of the role of geology. Based on our analysis concerning the FSCA, we develop a perceptual model that explains how the increasing duration of the snowpack promotes a progressive emptying of the groundwater storage during winter, thereby increasing the streamwater age, while ephemeral snowpack generally favors rapid flow paths that increase Fyw. Finally, our work highlights that Fbf, considered as a proxy for groundwater flow, is roughly the one’s complement of Fyw. In harmony with the model, we find high Fbf during all low-flow periods, which underlines that streamflow is mainly sustained by groundwater in such flow conditions. For catchments where the winter low-flow period is long compared to the summer high-flow period, this results in low Fyw.

In conclusion, our data set suggests that Fbf is the best explanatory variable of Fyw elevation gradients in Alpine catchments, implying the key-role of major groundwater storages that, with the increasing snowpack duration, are actively involved in streamflow generation processes.

Alessio Gentile et al.

Status: open (until 15 Nov 2022)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Alessio Gentile et al.

Alessio Gentile et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 171 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
126 41 4 171 13 2 1
  • HTML: 126
  • PDF: 41
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 171
  • Supplement: 13
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Sep 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 159 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 159 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Sep 2022
Download
Short summary
What drives the young water fraction (i.e. the fraction of water in streamflow younger than roughly 2–3 months) variations with elevation? Why is Fyw counterintuitively low in high-elevation catchments, in spite of steeper topography compared with lower elevations? In this paper it is shown how the long duration of the snowpack favors the groundwater contribution to streamflow, thus increasing the streamwater age. A dataset of 27 Swiss and Italian catchments between 472 and 3049 m asl is used.