Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-898
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-898
03 Nov 2022
 | 03 Nov 2022

Analysis of Systematic Biases in Tropospheric Hydrostatic Delay Models and Construction of Correction Model

Haopeng Fan, Siran Li, Zhongmiao Sun, Guorui Xiao, Xinxing Li, and Xiaogang Liu

Abstract. In the fields of space geodetic techniques, such as Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), tropospheric zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) is chosen as the a priori value of tropospheric total delay. Therefore, the inaccuracy of ZHD will definitely infect parameters like the wet delay and the horizontal gradient of tropospheric delay, accompanied by an indirect influence on the accuracy of geodetic parameters, if not dealt with well at low elevation angles. In fact, however, the most widely used ZHD model currently seems to contain millimetre-level biases from the precise integral method. We explored the bias of traditional ZHD models and analysed the characteristics in different aspects on a global annual scale. It was found that biases differ significantly with season and geographical location, and the difference between the maximum and minimum values exceed 30 mm, which should be fully considered in the field of high-precision measurement. Then, we constructed a global grid correction model, which is named ZHD_crct, based on the meteorological data of year 2020 from ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), and it turned out that the bias of traditional model in the current year could be reduced by ~50 % when the ZHD_crct was added. When we verified the effect of ZHD_crct on the biases in the next year, it worked almost the same as the former year. The mean absolute biases (MABs) of ZHD will be narrowed within ~0.5 mm for most regions, and the STD (standard deviation) will be within ~0.7 mm. This improvement will be helpful for researches on meteorological phenomena as well.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Feb 2023
Analysis of systematic biases in tropospheric hydrostatic delay models and construction of a correction model
Haopeng Fan, Siran Li, Zhongmiao Sun, Guorui Xiao, Xinxing Li, and Xiaogang Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1345–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023, 2023
Short summary

Haopeng Fan et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-898', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Dec 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Haopeng Fan, 24 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-898', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Haopeng Fan, 31 Dec 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-898', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Dec 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Haopeng Fan, 24 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-898', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Haopeng Fan, 31 Dec 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Haopeng Fan on behalf of the Authors (03 Jan 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Jan 2023) by Thomas Poulet
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (11 Jan 2023)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (22 Jan 2023)
ED: Publish as is (23 Jan 2023) by Thomas Poulet
AR by Haopeng Fan on behalf of the Authors (23 Jan 2023)

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Haopeng Fan on behalf of the Authors (09 Feb 2023)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (09 Feb 2023) by Thomas Poulet

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

24 Feb 2023
Analysis of systematic biases in tropospheric hydrostatic delay models and construction of a correction model
Haopeng Fan, Siran Li, Zhongmiao Sun, Guorui Xiao, Xinxing Li, and Xiaogang Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1345–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1345-2023, 2023
Short summary

Haopeng Fan et al.

Haopeng Fan et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
298 65 14 377 5 3
  • HTML: 298
  • PDF: 65
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 377
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 372 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 372 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 Mar 2023
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
The bias of traditional tropospheric zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) model is usually thought negligible, yet it still reaches 10 mm sometimes and would lead to mm-level position errors for space geodetic observations. Therefore, We analyzed the bias’ characteristics and present a grid model to correct the traditional ZHD formula. When we verified the efficiency based on data from ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), it turned out that ZHD biases were rectified by ~50 %.