Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-886
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-886
22 Sep 2022
 | 22 Sep 2022

Simulation and sensitivity analysis for cloud and precipitation measurements via spaceborne millimeter wave radar

Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding

Abstract. This study presents a simulation framework for cloud and precipitation measurements via spaceborne millimeter wave radar composed of nine sub modules. To demonstrate the influence of the assumed physical parameters and optimizing the microphysical modeling of the hydrometeors, we first conducted a sensitivity analysis. The results indicated that the radar reflectivity was highly sensitive to the particle size distribution (PSD) parameter of the median volume diameter and particle density parameter, which can cause reflectivity variations of several to more than 10 dB. The variation in the prefactor of the mass-power relations that related to riming degree may result in an uncertainty of approximately 30–45 %. The particle shape and orientation also had a significant impact on the radar reflectivity. The spherical assumption may result in an average overestimation of the reflectivity by approximately 4–8 %, dependent on the particle shape and orientation modeling. Typical weather cases were simulated using optimal physical modeling accounting for the particle shapes, typical PSD parameters corresponding to the cloud precipitation types, mass-power relations for snow and graupel, and melting modeling. We present and validate the simulation results for a cold front stratiform cloud and a deep convective process with observations from W-band cloud profiling radar (CPR) on the CloudSat satellite. The simulated brightness band features, echo structure, and intensity showed good agreement with the CloudSat observations; the average relative error in the vertical profile was within 20 %. Our results quantify the uncertainty in the millimeter wave radar echo simulation that may be caused by the physical model parameters and provide a scientific basis for optimal forward modeling. They also provide suggestions for prior physical parameter constraints for the retrieval of the microphysical properties of clouds and precipitation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

31 Mar 2023
Simulation and sensitivity analysis for cloud and precipitation measurements via spaceborne millimeter-wave radar
Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-886', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Leilei Kou, 13 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-886', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Nov 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Leilei Kou, 13 Dec 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-886', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Leilei Kou, 13 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-886', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Nov 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Leilei Kou, 13 Dec 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Leilei Kou on behalf of the Authors (13 Dec 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Dec 2022) by S. Joseph Munchak
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (12 Jan 2023)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (23 Jan 2023)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Feb 2023) by S. Joseph Munchak
AR by Leilei Kou on behalf of the Authors (15 Feb 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (02 Mar 2023) by S. Joseph Munchak
AR by Leilei Kou on behalf of the Authors (03 Mar 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (13 Mar 2023) by S. Joseph Munchak
AR by Leilei Kou on behalf of the Authors (14 Mar 2023)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

31 Mar 2023
Simulation and sensitivity analysis for cloud and precipitation measurements via spaceborne millimeter-wave radar
Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding
Leilei Kou, Zhengjian Lin, Haiyang Gao, Shujun Liao, and Piman Ding

Viewed

Total article views: 417 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
286 110 21 417 5 7
  • HTML: 286
  • PDF: 110
  • XML: 21
  • Total: 417
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Sep 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 377 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Aug 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Forward modeling of spaceborne millimeter wave radar composed of nine sub modules is presented. We quantify the uncertainties in radar reflectivity that may be caused by the physical model parameters via a sensitivity analysis. The simulations with optimal and conventional setting are compared with CloudSat data, and the improvement of optimal simulation are evaluated and analyzed. The results are instructive to the optimization in forward modeling and microphysical parameter retrieval.