Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-865
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-865
 
28 Sep 2022
28 Sep 2022

Rain process models and convergence to point processes

Scott Hottovy1 and Samuel N. Stechmann2 Scott Hottovy and Samuel N. Stechmann
  • 1Department of Mathematics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, USA
  • 2Department of Mathematics & Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Abstract. A variety of stochastic models have been used to describe time series of precipitation or rainfall. Since many of these stochastic models are simplistic, it is desirable to develop connections between the stochastic models and the underlying physics of rain. Here, convergence results are presented for such a connection between two stochastic models: (i) a stochastic moisture process as a physics-based description of atmospheric moisture evolution, and (ii) a point process for rainfall time series as spike trains. The moisture process has dynamics that switch after the moisture hits a threshold, which represents the onset of rainfall and thereby gives rise to an associated rainfall process. This rainfall process is characterized by its random holding times for dry and wet periods. On average, the holding times for the wet periods are much shorter than the dry, and, in the limit of short wet periods, the rainfall process converges to a point process that is a spike train. Also, in the limit, the underlying moisture process becomes a threshold model with a teleporting boundary condition. To establish these limits and connections, formal asymptotic convergence is shown using the Fokker-Planck equation, which provides some intuitive understanding. Also, rigorous convergence is proved in mean-square with respect to continuous functions, of the moisture process, and convergence in mean-square with respect to generalized functions, of the rain process.

Scott Hottovy and Samuel N. Stechmann

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-865', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-865', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Oct 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-865', Anonymous Referee #3, 31 Oct 2022

Scott Hottovy and Samuel N. Stechmann

Scott Hottovy and Samuel N. Stechmann

Viewed

Total article views: 249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
188 47 14 249 2 1
  • HTML: 188
  • PDF: 47
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 249
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 247 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 247 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2022
Download
Short summary
Rainfall is erratic and difficult to predict. Thus random models are often used to describe rainfall events. Since many of these random models are based more on statistics than physical laws, it is desirable to develop connections between the random statistical models and the underlying physics of rain. Here, a physics-based model is shown to converge to a statistics-based model, which helps to provide a physical basis for the statistics-based model.