Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-84
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-84
14 Apr 2022
 | 14 Apr 2022

The perception of palaeontology in commercial off-the-shelf video games and an assessment of their potential as educational tools

Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard Dearden, and Valentina Rossi

Abstract. Video games now comprise the largest sector of the media entertainment industry. Hundreds of video games, spanning a huge variety of genres and platforms, use extinct animals and/or palaeontological themes as a basis for their gameplay. Because of this, many players, especially children, spend long periods of time engaging with, and immersed in, palaeontological concepts and themes. Indeed, video games may be the first medium of implicit or tangential science communication they engage with, especially with regards to palaeontology. However, commercial off-the-shelf video games are not primarily designed to be educational tools, and the proliferation of some common tropes can disseminate harmful and/or unethical (mis)information regarding palaeontology. This paper introduces the major types of palaeontological video games and discusses their educational potential. Moreover, we highlight the most common palaeontological tropes observed in video games, both positive and negative, to better inform science communicators about the perception of palaeontology (and ancient animals) in this massively influential medium. Furthermore, by highlighting common misconceptions and harmful tropes we aim to bring awareness to game developers who may be unaware that they could be propagating negative tropes about palaeontological science.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

27 Sep 2022
The perception of palaeontology in commercial off-the-shelf video games and an assessment of their potential as educational tools
Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard P. Dearden, and Valentina Rossi
Geosci. Commun., 5, 289–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-289-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard Dearden, and Valentina Rossi

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Flavia Strani, 02 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Elsa Panciroli, 03 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Andrea Villa, 03 May 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Flavia Strani, 02 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Elsa Panciroli, 03 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-84', Andrea Villa, 03 May 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Thomas Clements, 04 Jul 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (15 Jul 2022) by Leslie Almberg
AR by Thomas Clements on behalf of the Authors (15 Jul 2022)  Author's response   Manuscript 
EF by Una Miškovic (21 Jul 2022)  Author's tracked changes 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (03 Aug 2022) by Leslie Almberg
AR by Thomas Clements on behalf of the Authors (10 Aug 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (17 Aug 2022) by Leslie Almberg
ED: Publish as is (17 Aug 2022) by Solmaz Mohadjer (Executive editor)
AR by Thomas Clements on behalf of the Authors (23 Aug 2022)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

27 Sep 2022
The perception of palaeontology in commercial off-the-shelf video games and an assessment of their potential as educational tools
Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard P. Dearden, and Valentina Rossi
Geosci. Commun., 5, 289–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-289-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard Dearden, and Valentina Rossi
Thomas Clements, Jake Atterby, Terri Cleary, Richard Dearden, and Valentina Rossi

Viewed

Total article views: 890 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
584 299 7 890 27 7 5
  • HTML: 584
  • PDF: 299
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 890
  • Supplement: 27
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 819 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 819 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Video games are the largest sector of the entertainment industry and often contain ancient animals (e.g. dinosaurs) and/or fossils. This may be the first or only exposure gamers have to palaeontology and it provides a useful starting point for science outreach. However, video games are not typically designed to be educational. We investigate the use of palaeontology in video games and highlight common tropes that may mislead the public and skew their perception of palaeontological science.