Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-482
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-482
22 Jul 2022
 | 22 Jul 2022

Sensitivity of the pseudo-global warming method under flood conditions: A case study from the Northeastern U.S.

Zeyu Xue and Paul Aaron Ullrich

Abstract. Intensified extreme precipitation and resulting flooding are among the most impactful consequences of climate change, especially over the northeastern US (NEUS). To project and understand the impacts of climate change (or related climate perturbations) on extreme weather events as they may occur in the future, the Pseudo-Global Warming (PGW) method has been employed with great success. However, it has never been ascertained to what degree the conclusions from PGW studies are sensitive to the design of the PGW experiment. Consequently, three key questions related to the application of the PGW method remain unanswered: At what spatial scale should climate perturbations be applied? Among the different meteorological variables available, which should be perturbed? And will PGW projections vary significantly under different experiment designs? To begin to address these questions, we examine the sensitivity and robustness of conclusions drawn from the PGW method over NEUS by conducting multiple PGW experiments. The results show that the projections of precipitation and other essential variables are consistent at the regional mean scale, with a relative difference of much less than 10\%; however, different experimental designs nonetheless cause significant displacements among storm events. Several previously assumed advantages of modifying temperature at the regional mean scale do not appear to hold, such as the preservation of geostrophic balance. Also, we find the regional mean perturbation produces a positive precipitation bias due to overestimated warming over the ocean. Overall, PGW experiments with perturbations from temperature or the combination of temperature and wind at the gridpoint scale are both recommended, depending on the research target. The first approach can isolate the spatially-dependent thermodynamic impact, and the latter incorporates both the thermodynamic and dynamic impacts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

15 May 2023
Sensitivity of the pseudo-global warming method under flood conditions: a case study from the northeastern US
Zeyu Xue, Paul Ullrich, and Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1909–1927, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Zeyu Xue and Paul Aaron Ullrich

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-482', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Oct 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zeyu Xue, 13 Oct 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Zeyu Xue, 29 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-482', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Oct 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Zeyu Xue, 14 Oct 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Zeyu Xue, 29 Oct 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-482', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Oct 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zeyu Xue, 13 Oct 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Zeyu Xue, 29 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-482', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Oct 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Zeyu Xue, 14 Oct 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on RC2', Zeyu Xue, 29 Oct 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (20 Nov 2022) by Yi He
AR by Zeyu Xue on behalf of the Authors (24 Dec 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (08 Feb 2023) by Yi He
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (13 Feb 2023)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (12 Mar 2023) by Yi He
AR by Zeyu Xue on behalf of the Authors (22 Mar 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Apr 2023) by Yi He
AR by Zeyu Xue on behalf of the Authors (21 Apr 2023)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

15 May 2023
Sensitivity of the pseudo-global warming method under flood conditions: a case study from the northeastern US
Zeyu Xue, Paul Ullrich, and Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1909–1927, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Zeyu Xue and Paul Aaron Ullrich

Data sets

WRF data in "Sensitivity and robustness examination of the pseudo-global warming method for flood events: A case study from the Northeastern U.S." Zeyu Xue and Paul Ullrich https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6609204

The sea level pressure animations during flood and dry periods used in paper "Sensitivity of the pseudo-global warming method under flood conditions: A case study from the Northeastern U.S." Zeyu Xue and Paul Ullrich https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6544880

Zeyu Xue and Paul Aaron Ullrich

Viewed

Total article views: 605 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
449 133 23 605 48 8 10
  • HTML: 449
  • PDF: 133
  • XML: 23
  • Total: 605
  • Supplement: 48
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jul 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jul 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 562 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 562 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 04 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
The pseudo-global warming (PGW) method has been increasingly used to simulate the effects of climate change on historical weather events. However, no guidance is available on how PGW methods should be applied, and if the conclusions drawn from these studies are sensitive to the choice of experimental design. Therefore, we conduct and compare simulations under different experimental designs to examine their differences and provide guidance on how to choose their experimental design for others.