the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Particle size distribution and PM concentrations during synoptic and convective dust events in West Texas
Abstract. Dust events are an important and complex constituent of the atmospheric system that can impact Earth’s climate, the environment, and human health. The frequency of dust events in West Texas has increased over the past two decades, yet their impact on air quality in this region is still unclear as there is only one air quality monitoring station that measures only PM2.5 concentrations (Particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm), and there is no information on other PM sizes or particle size distribution. The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) unit provides insight into the local variation of particle concentration during different dust events and allows for a better understanding of the impact of dust events on air quality. Since the west Texas area is prone to dust events, we were wondering if dust events generated by different meteorological causes (synoptic vs convective) will present similar particle concentrations or particle size distributions. In this project, three different dust events were measured by AEROS and compared. Each dust event originated from a different direction and lasted a different duration. One of the dust events was synoptic (April 10, 2019) and two were convective (June 5 and 21, 2019). Measurements of particle mass and number concentration, size distribution, and meteorological conditions for each dust event were compared. The Synoptic dust event (of April 10) was longer (12 h) and had stronger wind speed conditions (up to 22.1 m sec-1), while the two convective dust events lasted only 20 and 30 minutes and had lower wind speeds (up to 16.5 and 13.4 m sec-1 for June 5 and 21, respectively). Observation of PM based on daily and hourly values showed an impact on air quality, yet measurements based on daily and hourly values underestimate the impact of the convective dust events. Observations based on a shorter time scale (10-minutes) reveal the true impact of the two convective dust events. A comparison of particle size distribution showed that all three dust events had an increase of particles in the size range of 0.3 to 10 µm. Some particle sizes even increase the concentration by ~2 orders of magnitude compared to the time before the dust event. Leading us to speculate that the impact on air quality of convective dust events in this region is underestimated with the current (hourly basis) method.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(638 KB)
-
Supplement
(13078 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(638 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(13078 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 May 2022
The authors present an interesting study on the properties of dust particles during convective-driven and synoptic-driven dust storms. The study is based on in-situ measurements of mass and number concentrations of dust particles and also size distributions at high temporal resolution. It is well written with justified results and provides important evidence of dust properties inside the dust storms. Overall I recommend publication in ACP.
Minor considerations are:
1. Move the Grimm results (Figure S3) from the supplement to the main text and elaborate more on the results shown in this plot. These are important measurements of coarse dust particles (>10um) directly inside the density currents that are not often available in the literature.Â
2. Line 281, a typo, Coarse
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-193-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Karin Ardon-Dryer, 17 Jun 2022
-
RC2: 'Review report egusphere-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 May 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-193/egusphere-2022-193-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Karin Ardon-Dryer, 17 Jun 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 May 2022
The authors present an interesting study on the properties of dust particles during convective-driven and synoptic-driven dust storms. The study is based on in-situ measurements of mass and number concentrations of dust particles and also size distributions at high temporal resolution. It is well written with justified results and provides important evidence of dust properties inside the dust storms. Overall I recommend publication in ACP.
Minor considerations are:
1. Move the Grimm results (Figure S3) from the supplement to the main text and elaborate more on the results shown in this plot. These are important measurements of coarse dust particles (>10um) directly inside the density currents that are not often available in the literature.Â
2. Line 281, a typo, Coarse
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-193-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Karin Ardon-Dryer, 17 Jun 2022
-
RC2: 'Review report egusphere-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 May 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-193/egusphere-2022-193-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Karin Ardon-Dryer, 17 Jun 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
311 | 93 | 5 | 409 | 25 | 2 | 4 |
- HTML: 311
- PDF: 93
- XML: 5
- Total: 409
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Karin Ardon-Dryer
Mary C. Kelley
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(638 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(13078 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper