the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention
Abstract. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are closely associated with historical extreme precipitation events over East Asia. The projected increase in such weather systems under global warming has been extensively discussed in previous studies, while the role of stratospheric aerosol, particularly for the implementation of stratospheric aerosol intervention (SAI), in such a change remains unknown. Based on an ensemble of the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1) simulations, here we investigate changes in the frequency of ARs and their associated mean and extreme precipitation under a range of climate forcing, including greenhouse gas emission scenarios of high (SSP5-8.5) and medium (SSP2-4.5) levels, the deployment of SAI geoengineering (G6sulfur) and solar dimming (G6solar). The result indicates a significant increase in AR frequency and AR-related precipitation over most of East Asia in a warmer climate and the most pronounced changes are observed in southern China. Comparing to G6solar and both the SSPs scenarios, the G6sulfur simulations indicate that SAI is effective in partly ameliorating the increases in AR activity over the subtropical region; however, it may result in more pronounced increases in ARs and associated precipitation over the mid-high latitude regions, particularly northeastern China and Japan. Such a response is associated with the further weakening of the mid-latitude westerly jet stream under SAI that favours the high-latitude AR activity. This is driven by the decreased meridional gradient of thermal expansion in the mid-high troposphere associated with aerosol cooling across the tropical region, though SAI effectively ameliorates the widespread increase in thermal expansion under climate warming. Such a side effect of SAI over the populated region implies that caution must be taken when considering geoengineering approaches to mitigating hydrological risk under climate change.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(4694 KB)
-
Supplement
(1644 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4694 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1644 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1101', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Nov 2022
In this manuscript, the authors presented results of a series of greenhouse gases and stratospheric aerosol forcing experiments conducted in UKESM1. They focused on future changes in atmospheric river activity, ARs contributions to total rainfall and heavy rainfall, and associated background changes, including upper tropospheric westerly jet, thickness, and lower tropospheric circulation. The results are comprehensive and novel. Although number of tested AR detection scheme and model are limited, these analysis results are beneficial for readers of this journal. I also think further improvements, particularly discussion on future changes in atmospheric circulation and associated AR frequency on global scale, are still needed.
It seems to me that discussion on physical reasons for changes in upper tropospheric thickness, atmospheric circulation, and AR activity are not sufficient. Previous studies identified that forcing factors and ocean warming result in different patterns of changes in thickness and atmospheric circulation over East Asia (e.g. doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2073-0, doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2146-0, doi:10.1038/ngeo2449, doi:10.2151/sola.2018-010). Such discussion, especially in terms of land-sea warming contrast, should be added to help better understanding on physical mechanisms of different changes in upper troposphere in response to different forcing factors.
I also recommend to include global maps of thickness, geopotential, and wind patterns in response to SSP, sulfur, and solar forcing. Such global figures may help more reasonable understanding on changes in atmospheric river activity over East Asia.
Line 211: I don't think the results of these simulations support the SAH expansion. Increasing geopotential height are found outside of SAH region. The increase in geopotential height at 40-60N doesn't indicate SAH expansion but enhanced land-sea contrast over East Asia.
I also think more discussion on future changes in summertime storm track is needed for better understanding on changes in AR activity. Previous studies pointed out shift and weakening of storm track over the summertime North Pacific (doi:10.1029/2020JD032701, doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0083-8). Such changes in storm track and associated changes in jet stream should be investigated in more detail, because such mid-latitude disturbances should be essentially important for AR activity.
In figures 9 and 10, the authors investigated changes in heavy rainfall associated with ARs. The results are very interesting. However, when you discuss fractional contribution of ARs to heavy rainfall, you need to discuss effect of tropical cyclones. As indicated in many previous studies (e.g. doi:10.2151/sola.2017-002), future changes in tropical cyclone frequency/intensity are primarily important for future changes in heavy rainfall over the western North Pacific. Therefore, discussion on AR frequency itself is not sufficient for discussion on fractional contribution to heavy rainfall. I recommend the authors to add discussion on future changes in TC-related heavy rainfall over this region in these simulations.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1101-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ju Liang, 10 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1101', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Nov 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-1101/egusphere-2022-1101-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ju Liang, 10 Jan 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1101', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Nov 2022
In this manuscript, the authors presented results of a series of greenhouse gases and stratospheric aerosol forcing experiments conducted in UKESM1. They focused on future changes in atmospheric river activity, ARs contributions to total rainfall and heavy rainfall, and associated background changes, including upper tropospheric westerly jet, thickness, and lower tropospheric circulation. The results are comprehensive and novel. Although number of tested AR detection scheme and model are limited, these analysis results are beneficial for readers of this journal. I also think further improvements, particularly discussion on future changes in atmospheric circulation and associated AR frequency on global scale, are still needed.
It seems to me that discussion on physical reasons for changes in upper tropospheric thickness, atmospheric circulation, and AR activity are not sufficient. Previous studies identified that forcing factors and ocean warming result in different patterns of changes in thickness and atmospheric circulation over East Asia (e.g. doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2073-0, doi:10.1007/s00382-014-2146-0, doi:10.1038/ngeo2449, doi:10.2151/sola.2018-010). Such discussion, especially in terms of land-sea warming contrast, should be added to help better understanding on physical mechanisms of different changes in upper troposphere in response to different forcing factors.
I also recommend to include global maps of thickness, geopotential, and wind patterns in response to SSP, sulfur, and solar forcing. Such global figures may help more reasonable understanding on changes in atmospheric river activity over East Asia.
Line 211: I don't think the results of these simulations support the SAH expansion. Increasing geopotential height are found outside of SAH region. The increase in geopotential height at 40-60N doesn't indicate SAH expansion but enhanced land-sea contrast over East Asia.
I also think more discussion on future changes in summertime storm track is needed for better understanding on changes in AR activity. Previous studies pointed out shift and weakening of storm track over the summertime North Pacific (doi:10.1029/2020JD032701, doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0083-8). Such changes in storm track and associated changes in jet stream should be investigated in more detail, because such mid-latitude disturbances should be essentially important for AR activity.
In figures 9 and 10, the authors investigated changes in heavy rainfall associated with ARs. The results are very interesting. However, when you discuss fractional contribution of ARs to heavy rainfall, you need to discuss effect of tropical cyclones. As indicated in many previous studies (e.g. doi:10.2151/sola.2017-002), future changes in tropical cyclone frequency/intensity are primarily important for future changes in heavy rainfall over the western North Pacific. Therefore, discussion on AR frequency itself is not sufficient for discussion on fractional contribution to heavy rainfall. I recommend the authors to add discussion on future changes in TC-related heavy rainfall over this region in these simulations.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1101-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ju Liang, 10 Jan 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1101', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Nov 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-1101/egusphere-2022-1101-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ju Liang, 10 Jan 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
304 | 88 | 15 | 407 | 48 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 304
- PDF: 88
- XML: 15
- Total: 407
- Supplement: 48
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Ju Liang
Jim Haywood
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4694 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1644 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper