Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-986
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-986
16 Jun 2026
 | 16 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Performance and Controlling Factors of Airborne LiDAR Snow Depth Estimates in Boreal Forests: Insights from NASA SnowEx 2023 Alaska Campaign

Jipeng Liu, Eunsang Cho, and Carrie M. Vuyovich

Abstract. Quantifying spatial distribution of the snowpack is crucial for hydrological, ecological, and climate research, as well as their applications. Due to the high spatial resolution and extensive coverage, Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has emerged as an effective tool for large-scale snow depth estimation. However, discrepancies between LiDAR-derived and manually measured snow depth values exist across areas influenced by topographical and vegetation characteristics such as canopy height, slope, and roughness. This study aims to 1) evaluate the performance of the airborne LiDAR snow depth measurements compared to magnaprobe in-situ data and 2) identify key factors affecting the accuracy of airborne LiDAR snow depth measurements focusing on the boreal forest environment. We utilize airborne LiDAR data and ground-based snow depth observations collected in the Fairbanks region of central Alaska during NASA SnowEx 2023 Alaska Campaign. The study focuses on three subregions: Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest (BCEF), Farmers Loop Creamers Field (FLCF), and Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed (CPCRW). The results showed that the LiDAR snow depth data has a reasonable agreement with in-situ observations (R: 0.605, Mean Absolute Error: 18.8 cm) but exhibits varying levels of errors across the three subregions. By applying regression analysis and machine learning, we quantify the contribution of individual factors to measurement discrepancies and determine which factors are most influential. We employed Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model using five LiDAR-derived environmental variables—canopy height, elevation, slope, roughness, and ground point density—as predictors of relative error. Across all subregions and models, canopy height consistently emerged as the most important factor of LiDAR snow depth error.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jipeng Liu, Eunsang Cho, and Carrie M. Vuyovich

Status: open (until 28 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jipeng Liu, Eunsang Cho, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Jipeng Liu, Eunsang Cho, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 16 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We analyzed airborne LiDAR data from NASA’s SnowEx 2023 campaign to study snow depth in Alaska’s boreal forests. Comparing LiDAR to ground measurements, we found it captures general snow patterns well, though tall trees and slopes reduce accuracy. This approach can help improve snow surveys and better manage water resources in remote forested areas.
Share