the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
On some factors controlling fission-track etch rates in apatite
Abstract. Fission tracks in apatite must be etched to be counted and measured with an optical microscope. Track etching is described with the aid of two velocities: the track etch rate vT and the apatite etch rate vR. On their values depend the efficiencies of track counts, the selection of confined tracks for measurement, and the shapes of etched tracks; vR is an indicator of the apatite composition and annealing kinetics. In spite of this, direct measurements of vT and vR have long been wanting. This work provides numerical data and investigates factors controlling vT and vR. The results indicate that vT is constant over most of the ion- and fission-fragment ranges in apatite (constant core). We observed that, when using a step-etch protocol, the etchant advances at a high, but finite, rate along tracks etched in a preceding step. Thus, step-etching broadens the effective-etch-time distribution, and the summed etch time overestimates the aggregate effect of the procedure. Neither annealing of induced tracks nor ageing of fossil tracks has a measurable effect on vT. Since the vT-value along a particular track section does not depend on its radius or on the work expended to create it, it can be considered characteristic of an apatite instead of a track. This could account for the different vT of the Duluth and Durango apatites. The identical distributions of the host-confined-track intersections, c-axis angles, and track-etch rates across all experiments suggests that confined-track selection is little dependent on the track densities or lengths, but dominated by a condition that is unaffected by annealing. In contrast to vT, vR exhibits clear variation related to radiation damage from natural background radiation in the case of fossil tracks and from neutron irradiation in case of induced. Greater vR shorten the access times to confined tracks, increasing their effective etch times. This implies a need for caution when using Dpar to assess the annealing kinetics.
- Preprint
(2228 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4096 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-889', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Apr 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Raymond Jonkheere, 14 Apr 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-889', Richard A. Ketcham, 10 Apr 2026
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Raymond Jonkheere, 14 Apr 2026
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC2', Richard A. Ketcham, 27 Apr 2026
In response to my comment concerning Fig. 3a and the appearance of structured residuals, the authors reply: “A concave-upwards trend means that the diamonds at greater distance from the surface are larger than for a constant vT. Larger means longer effective etch times and shorter access times, which in turn implies a greater average vT between their surface and the crack intersections, i.e., a vT increase towards the tip.”
I stand corrected; the quantities being graphed are unfamiliar and thus a little tricky to interpret, at least for me. One insight that helped me is that the steady increase in steepness of the curves in Fig. 3a also provides a direct indication of the time lag in re-etching; if the etched track was infiltrated instantly, then the lines would be parallel. In any event, the apparent non-linearity remains interesting, even if it implies a rising etch rate, and I look forward to the authors providing the raw data as part of their published manuscript.To the authors’ final comment (“We propose to refer to the reviewer's results (pers. com.?) and to moderate our conclusion.”), the Dpar measurements are in the supplement to Tamer and Ketcham 2020 (Tamer, M.T., Ketcham, R.A., 2020. Is low-temperature fission-track annealing in apatite a thermally controlled process? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21, e2019GC008877. DOI: 10.1029/2019GC008877), and Tioga apatite fission-track ages and U determinations are reported by Roden and Miller (Roden, Mary K., and Donald S. Miller. "Apatite fission-track thermochronology of the Pennsylvania Appalachian Basin." Geomorphology 2.1-3 (1989): 39-51.). If they want to also refer to a personal communication, these peer reviews have their own DOI, so that might be the modern way to do it.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-889-RC3
-
RC3: 'Reply on AC2', Richard A. Ketcham, 27 Apr 2026
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Raymond Jonkheere, 14 Apr 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 157 | 63 | 15 | 235 | 32 | 10 | 13 |
- HTML: 157
- PDF: 63
- XML: 15
- Total: 235
- Supplement: 32
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
See the attached PDF.