Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-884
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-884
20 May 2026
 | 20 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Brief Communication: Structured Virtual Expert Panels for Interdisciplinary Ideation in Natural Hazard Science

Jui-Ming Chang, Nativ Ron, Qi Zhou, and Shang Jyh Yiin

Abstract. We present a virtual expert panel workflow for early-stage interdisciplinary ideation in natural hazard research. Using the Six Thinking Hats framework, a moderator questions multiple virtual experts to elicit points of consensus, contested assumptions, knowledge gaps, and follow-up clarifications. We demonstrate this workflow using a debris-flow monitoring case at the Illgraben, Switzerland. The panel highlights concept drift: year-to-year environmental change shifts the link between seismic signals and event labels and reduces machine-learning generalization. The output motivates ideas on deployment-realistic evaluation, including time-ordered data splits for training and testing, and forward-chaining validation. The workflow provides a traceable record for hypothesis formulation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jui-Ming Chang, Nativ Ron, Qi Zhou, and Shang Jyh Yiin

Status: open (until 02 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jui-Ming Chang, Nativ Ron, Qi Zhou, and Shang Jyh Yiin
Jui-Ming Chang, Nativ Ron, Qi Zhou, and Shang Jyh Yiin
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Natural hazard studies need diverse expertise, but busy specialists may not meet early enough to shape the first research questions. We present a virtual panel that guides a discussion and records agreements, disagreements, missing information, and follow-up checks. Using a debris flow monitoring example in Switzerland, the panel shows that year to year environmental change can weaken detection, so testing should follow time order. The workflow helps turn ideas into testable studies.
Share