Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-747
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-747
18 Feb 2026
 | 18 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Limitations of 2-pool models in representing different time-scale dynamics of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon

Franco Fernández-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustín Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, and Carlos Sierra

Abstract. In the last decade, the conceptual framework that characterizes soil organic carbon (SOC) into particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) fractions has gained traction in studies of C dynamics. This SOC characterization is useful for developing empirical studies and for parsimonious model parameterizations. However, rigorous testing of model structures incorporating the POC-MAOC framework is still lacking, in particular tests involving simultaneous measurements of C pool changes and respiration fluxes. We conducted an incubation experiment using control and litter-addition treatments, measuring changes in SOC fraction contents and respiration fluxes throughout the incubation. Then, we applied an inverse modelling approach to compare the performance of 2-pool (POC-MAOC) and 3-pool models (which also included a faster-cycling litter C pool) to reproduce the observed data. We then calculated the C ages and transit times to explore the predicted C persistence. Finally, we performed simulations to evaluate the effects of different model structures and parameterizations on SOC persistence. For both treatments, we observed that 2-pool models were unable to simultaneously reproduce the changes in C pool contents and respiration, while the 3-pool models adequately predicted both variables and yielded lower C ages and transit times. The fact that 3-pool models outperformed 2-pool models even for control soils, indicates that POC represents a heterogeneous pool that should be modelled as distinct compartments. We discuss that 2-pool models collapse POC dynamics operating at different timescales into a single one, failing to capture the different respiration phases and the gradual C pool changes. In contrast, 3-pool models distributed C processes operating at different timescales among compartments: the litter C pool captured faster-cycling dynamics, allowing POC and MAOC to better represent intermediate- and long-term dynamics, respectively. We also found that both model structure and changes in key parameters affected C persistence estimations. Models that included shorter pathways to MAOC, or allowed faster transfers into more persistent pools, predicted higher C age and transit time. This study highlights the limitations of representing SOC dynamics exclusively through POC and MAOC and shows how model structure shapes SOC contents and persistence estimates. Rather than advocating a specific model configuration, our results suggest that SOC models should explicitly represent processes operating across multiple timescales, which, depending on the ecosystem context, may require incorporating additional C compartments beyond the POC-MAOC framework. Furthermore, as transfer rates play a key role in determining SOC persistence, it is important to better understand and quantify how C is transferred toward MAOC and how these processes can be represented in models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Franco Fernández-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustín Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, and Carlos Sierra

Status: open (until 01 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Franco Fernández-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustín Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, and Carlos Sierra

Data sets

respiration_data.xlsx Franco Fernandez-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustin Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, Carlos A. Sierra https://github.com/Holinwj/Model-POC-MAOC

C_contents_data Franco Fernandez-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustin Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, Carlos A. Sierra https://github.com/Holinwj/Model-POC-MAOC

Model code and software

2ps_model.R Franco Fernandez-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustin Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, Carlos A. Sierra https://github.com/Holinwj/Model-POC-MAOC

3ps_model.R Franco Fernandez-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustin Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, Carlos A. Sierra https://github.com/Holinwj/Model-POC-MAOC

3ps_10_litter.R Franco Fernandez-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustin Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, Carlos A. Sierra https://github.com/Holinwj/Model-POC-MAOC

Franco Fernández-Catinot, Wanjia Hu, Agustín Sarquis, María Victoria Vaieretti, Natalia Perez-Harguindeguy, Xiaojuan Feng, and Carlos Sierra

Viewed

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
32 7 2 41 2 3 1
  • HTML: 32
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 41
  • Supplement: 2
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 41 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
We tested how soil carbon models predict carbon storage and respiration using soil incubation data. We compared 2-pool models based on particulate and mineral-associated carbon with 3-pool models that also include faster-cycling carbon. 3-pool models performed better because they captured carbon dynamics operating at different timescales. We then simulated alternative model structures and found that transfer rates into the most persistent pool were the main control on overall carbon persistence.
Share