the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Reducing False Alarms in Urban Flood Detection: An Enhanced NDWI (ENDWI) with Hybrid Max Fusion on Sentinel-2 Data
Abstract. Although optical satellite-derived water indices have significantly advanced urban flood detection, accurately distinguishing flooded from non-flooded pixels while minimizing false positives caused by spectral confusion in built-up areas remains a considerable challenge. This study proposes and evaluates the Enhanced Normalized Difference Water Index (ENDWI) in comparison with seven established water indices to reduce false alarms in complex urban environments. The approach was applied to a flash flood event in Al-Lith Governorate, a coastal urban area along the Red Sea in Saudi Arabia, selected as the case study because of its recurrent vulnerability to intense rainfall and rapid-onset flooding. Sentinel-2 imagery acquired two days after the event served as the core methodology for this study. Validation was performed using WorldView-4 high-resolution imagery obtained within two days of the event, based on 1,262 ground-truth points (559 flooded and 703 non-flooded) generated within polygons to ensure consistency with the Sentinel-2 spatial resolution. Analysis of the raw indices revealed that the Automated Water Extraction Index for shadows (AWEIsh_raw) achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC = 0.836), followed by the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI_raw) (0.813) and ENDWI_raw (0.784), positioning ENDWI among the top three performers. Following Otsu thresholding, ENDWI_otsu yielded the highest overall accuracy (79.41 %) and the lowest false alarm rate (10.95 %). A novel hybrid maximum fusion of ENDWI_raw and AWEIsh_raw further enhanced results, attaining an overall accuracy of 82.65 %, producer’s accuracy of 94.50 %, F1-score of 76.73 %, and Kappa coefficient of 0.637 after thresholding, with only 21 false positives (false alarm rate = 2.99 %). Overall, ENDWI exhibited robust and consistent performance across individual applications, post-thresholding, and hybrid fusion with AWEIsh, establishing it as a reliable and effective tool for accurate urban flood mapping.
- Preprint
(1948 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 May 2026)
- AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-672', Abdulrhman Almoadi, 09 Feb 2026 reply
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-672', Chandra Mohan Bhatt, 30 Mar 2026
reply
The study presents an attempt to improve flood detection in urban areas using the Enhanced Normalized Difference Water Index (ENDWI). However, the abstract needs to more clearly specify which spectral bands, beyond those used in conventional indices, were incorporated in the ENDWI formulation. Additionally, the authors should briefly explain the spectral rationale behind the observed reduction in false alarms, as this would enhance the general understanding and acceptance of the proposed approach.
At present, the abstract places greater emphasis on statistical results rather than adequately highlighting the methodological innovation and underlying approach. A better balance between methodological description and results would significantly strengthen the abstract.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-672-CC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on CC1', Abdulrhman Almoadi, 31 Mar 2026
reply
Dear Chandra Mohan Bhatt,
Thank you for your valuable comments,
We will consider mentioning all indices used in the abstract; the details of the spectral bands for each index have been included in the methodology section of this version due to the limited of words normally in the abstract. Instead of identifying the term for the eight indices in the abstract, the top three indices' performance was reported.
In addition, the ENDWI performance in reducing false alarms will be expanded across the study in the revised manuscript.
Thank you again for your feedback.
Abdulrhman Almoadi (corresponding author)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-672-AC2 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC2', Chandra Mohan Bhatt, 01 Apr 2026
reply
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your response. It would be helpful if the abstract clearly specifies whether the ENDWI is being proposed as a novel index or if it is an existing method being demonstrated through a case study. This clarification will improve the positioning and contribution of the study.
Additionally, the opening sentence of the abstract—“Although optical satellite-derived water indices have significantly advanced urban flood detection, accurately distinguishing flooded from non-flooded pixels while minimizing false positives caused by spectral confusion in built-up areas remains a considerable challenge”—could be made more concise to accommodate on ENDWI. A more focused introduction that directly highlights the ENDWI and its application would help in clearly conveying the purpose and novelty of the work.
Regards,
C. M. BhattCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-672-CC2 -
AC3: 'Reply on CC2', Abdulrhman Almoadi, 02 Apr 2026
reply
Dear Chandra Mohan Bhatt,
Thank you again for your communication and your comment,
The ENDWI, as an enhanced index, is completely novel; it's developed through experiments and derived from the traditional NDWI. It aims to reduce false alarms by focusing on really flooded areas. All these will pop up later in the abstract in the revised manuscript.
Abdulrhman Almoadi (Corresponding author)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-672-AC3 -
CC3: 'Reply on AC3', Chandra Mohan Bhatt, 02 Apr 2026
reply
Dear Editors,
The study presents a valuable contribution by proposing a novel index for urban flood detection.
The authors have agreed to incorporate the comments and suggestions provided into the revised version of the manuscript.
Regards,
C. M. BhattCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-672-CC3
-
CC3: 'Reply on AC3', Chandra Mohan Bhatt, 02 Apr 2026
reply
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC2', Abdulrhman Almoadi, 02 Apr 2026
reply
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC2', Chandra Mohan Bhatt, 01 Apr 2026
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CC1', Abdulrhman Almoadi, 31 Mar 2026
reply
Data sets
ENDWI data for water extraction Abdulrhman Almoadi https://github.com/aalmoadi/endwi
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 214 | 72 | 17 | 303 | 27 | 40 |
- HTML: 214
- PDF: 72
- XML: 17
- Total: 303
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 40
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear Editor and referees,
Thank you very much for your interest in our manuscript.
During a post-preprint check of the performance metrics, the False Alarm Ratio (FAR) has been clarified and is now reported using the standard definition (FP / (TP + FP)), where TP denotes true-positive pixels, and FP denotes false-positive pixels. The previously reported FAR values were calculated based on the total ground-truth samples, while the revised values are computed directly from predicted positive (water) pixels (TP + FP).
The revised FAR values are as follows:
Hybrid_Max: 5.50%
ENDWI_otsu: 20.59%
AWEIsh_otsu: 23.90%
NDWI_otsu: 44.33%
Importantly, the ranking of the indices in terms of false alarm reduction remains unchanged, and Hybrid_Max continues to show the lowest FAR (5.50%), which remains highly competitive and supports the core conclusions of the study.
We are committed to accuracy and will incorporate updated values in the revised manuscript submitted after the discussion phase.
Thank you again for your understanding and for the valuable interactive review process.
Best regards,
Abdulrhman Almoadi
Corresponding author