Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6577
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6577
30 Oct 2026
 | 30 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Resilient Stratospheric Aerosol Injection is Cooperative

Jared Farley, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, and Burgess L. Power

Abstract. For stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) to reduce climate risks across the globe without producing new or exacerbating current inequalities, it must be resilient to unpredictable or even malicious disturbances (e.g., disasters, pandemics, fascists). Two significant risks which arise from mismanaged SAI are termination shock (an abrupt termination after substantial warming is being avoided) and significant changes in large-scale tropical circulation patterns, including shifts in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) due to unbalanced cooling. In this paper, we use a state-of-the-art climate emulator capable of simulating the global and regional climate responses of cooperative and noncooperative SAI deployment. We show that SAI without the risk of termination shock or ITCZ shift must be a cooperative and global endeavor. Given the rapidly growing interest in SAI, a widespread understanding of the frailty of unilateral deployment and a desire for cooperation would help shape current and future discussion of geoengineering into a collaboration instead of an arms race.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Earth System Dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jared Farley, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, and Burgess L. Power

Status: open (until 11 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jared Farley, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, and Burgess L. Power
Jared Farley, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, and Burgess L. Power
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Sunlight-reflecting geoengineering can cool the climate, but it creates large risks if mismanaged. One of the largest risks is a sudden rise in global temperatures if deployment abruptly stops, and another is changes in rainfall patterns if the world is unevenly cooled. We use a simple model of the climate to show how having backup candidates is vital to the stability of the intervention. We hope that this research highlights a cooperative, decentralized option for geoengineering.
Share