Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6372
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6372
09 Nov 2026
 | 09 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Coverage of mobile methane leak surveys of gas distribution networks: The impact of wind-aware scheduling on the coverage distribution

David Ball, Nathan Eichenlaub, Karin Ohman, and Eric Chan

Abstract. Mobile leak surveys of gas distribution networks typically drive each street six times, two passes a night, and often run those nights in close succession. Each pass’s coverage (the pipe it is able to survey) depends on the wind direction, which is highly autocorrelated in time. This raises a concern about the standard practice: when passes are packed into a few nearby nights, does the wind direction vary enough for the survey to “see” the entire intended pipe, or do the repeated passes simply re-survey already-covered pipe and miss the rest?

To investigate this, we use 3,992 real survey drives, each paired with a plume model that computes the fraction of the pipeline a drive could survey under a given night’s wind. For each drive we run a Monte-Carlo simulation, repeatedly drawing historical wind from other candidate nights and computing the resulting distribution of coverage under two deployment strategies: “windblind” surveys that drive on random nights within a week, and “wind-aware” surveys that choose nights for complementary wind directions. We find that six blind passes over three closely spaced nights cover a median of 81 % of pipe. The distribution has a low tail: a hard network, or any network caught in an unlucky week, is left with roughly a third of its pipe uncovered, and that tail deepens for the smaller leaks, while line-of-sight blockage (a heuristic but physically motivated treatment of obstructions’ impact on plume detectability) lowers coverage further still. Because the wind varies little over a single night, coverage is set by how many distinct nights a survey samples rather than by its pass count. Choosing those nights by the wind, using only conditions available within a one-to-two week window, removes the low tail and covers more with fewer passes: four passes over two chosen nights beat six driven blind, and three chosen nights reach about 93 %.

Competing interests: At the time of this study, all authors were employed by Project Canary, a company that provides advanced mobile leak detection services.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
David Ball, Nathan Eichenlaub, Karin Ohman, and Eric Chan

Status: open (until 15 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
David Ball, Nathan Eichenlaub, Karin Ohman, and Eric Chan

Data sets

Advanced mobile leak survey detection-probability data (Luetschwager et al., 2021) Emily Luetschwager, Joseph C. von Fischer, Zachary D. Weller https://github.com/zdweller/ElementaDetectionProbabilities

David Ball, Nathan Eichenlaub, Karin Ohman, and Eric Chan

Viewed

Total article views: 51 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
38 9 4 51 7 6
  • HTML: 38
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 51
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 51 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 51 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Vehicles that drive streets to detect natural gas leaks usually cover each street several times, often on sequential nights. How much pipe a drive can survey depends on the wind. Using thousands of real surveys, we show that selectively choosing survey nights with complementary wind directions covers far more pipe than simply driving more without regard to wind. Picking nights by the wind finds more leaks with fewer trips, saving effort while improving safety.
Share