Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6174
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6174
20 Oct 2026
 | 20 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Canopy Structure Amplifies the Role of Radiation in Vegetation Responses Under Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Brendan Clark and Daniele Visioni

Abstract. Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) is a climate intervention approach that would inject aerosols into the stratosphere, reflecting a fraction of incoming sunlight and reducing surface temperatures to mitigate impacts of climate change. While ecological studies of SAI have largely focused on temperature and precipitation, observations following volcanic eruptions suggest that radiation changes may be a primary driver of vegetation responses to atmospheric aerosols. Here, we leverage two global land surface models with different complexity to isolate the effects of radiation under SAI. The big-leaf model, which represents vegetation as a single bulk canopy, suggests that radiation has little influence on vegetation, whereas the cohort-based model, which resolves vegetation size structure and canopy stratification, finds that radiation changes are a major driver of plant responses. In the cohort-based model, radiation changes increase global net primary production by 3.9% for broadleaf trees, 9.7% for needleleaf trees, and 2.6% for C3 grasses, but reduce it by 1.3% for C4 grasses, while the big-leaf model shows little overall response to radiation. These findings suggest that vegetation and agricultural impact studies that do not explicitly account for changes in radiation, or rely on simplified big leaf models, may not capture the full response to SAI.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Brendan Clark and Daniele Visioni

Status: open (until 01 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Brendan Clark and Daniele Visioni
Brendan Clark and Daniele Visioni
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Reflective aerosols have been proposed as a way to temporarily cool Earth. Assessing potential impacts of this usually focuses on temperature and precipitation, but radiation may be a primary driver of vegetation responses. We compare simulations from two land models with different complexities. The big leaf model shows negligible radiation effects from aerosols, while the model with canopy structure identifies radiation as a primary driver of plant response to atmospheric aerosols.
Share