Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5868
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5868
06 Nov 2026
 | 06 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Review article: using machine learning for snow remote sensing: trends and future directions for global snow measurements

Catherine Marina Breen, Kehan Yang, Justin Pflug, Sujay Kumar, Nicoleta Cristea, Ibrahim Alabi, and Carrie Vuyovich

Abstract. Snow covers 40 % of Earth’s northern hemisphere each year, playing an important role in regulating Earth’s energy balance through its reflective properties and serving as the primary source of freshwater for one-sixth of the world’s population. Remote sensing is a key technology for observing snow across large areas. Given the complexity of retrieving the snow signal from space, the snow community is increasingly using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches to derive and improve current spaceborne snow measurements. Here we summarize the research trends and applications of ML for snow retrievals, identifying best practices and the future direction of ML applications for multiple seasonal snow-related properties, in particular snow water equivalent (a measurement of the amount of water contained in the snow), snow depth, density, cover, and wet/dry conditions. Across our review, we find that most studies focus on extrapolating to new areas and time periods, with improved prediction after combining multiple sensors and referencing high-fidelity reference data. Gaps remain in generalizing across spatial domains, combining sensors at different spatial and temporal resolutions, and improving the ability of newer model architectures, such as transformers and foundation models, to support snow-related applications. ML/DL for snow remote sensing is an effective tool for integrating information across sensors, and we recommend the snow community continue to identify further use, thereby advancing towards more consistent and complete global snow monitoring that includes a range of snow types and climate conditions.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Catherine Marina Breen, Kehan Yang, Justin Pflug, Sujay Kumar, Nicoleta Cristea, Ibrahim Alabi, and Carrie Vuyovich

Status: open (until 18 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Catherine Marina Breen, Kehan Yang, Justin Pflug, Sujay Kumar, Nicoleta Cristea, Ibrahim Alabi, and Carrie Vuyovich
Catherine Marina Breen, Kehan Yang, Justin Pflug, Sujay Kumar, Nicoleta Cristea, Ibrahim Alabi, and Carrie Vuyovich
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
In this review, we present a summary of ML for snow remote sensing. We find that studies focus on extrapolating to new areas and time periods, with improved prediction after combining sensors and referencing high-fidelity reference data. Gaps remain in generalizing across spatial domains. As the diversity of satellite observations sensitive to snow continues to expand, evaluation of how ML can be used in tandem with snow remote sensing is essential for advancing global snow monitoring.
Share