Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5534
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5534
07 Oct 2026
 | 07 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Dark brown carbon and aerosol mixing impacts on absorbing aerosol optical depth in the southeastern United States

Alexandra E. Ng, Manish Shrivastava, Brian Gaudet, Cenlin He, Zezhen Cheng, and William Vizuete

Abstract. Wildfires are becoming more prevalent in the southeastern United States. Wildfires emit light absorbing organic aerosols such as black carbon and dark brown carbon (tar balls) that influence regional air quality and radiative forcing. Recent experimental work has identified dark brown carbon as a potentially significant source of warming in the atmosphere. However, dark brown carbon is not typically included in air quality and climate models. We added dark brown carbon from wildfires as a species in the Weather Research and Forecasting modeling system coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) version 4.2 with the Quick-Fire Emissions Database (QFED). The model simulations were run over the southeastern United States from June 21st to June 30th 2013 in conjunction with in-situ measurements of aerosol extinction from the Southeast Nexus (SENEX) aircraft campaign and aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements from the ground-based remote sensing Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). The impacts of imaginary refractive index, aerosol mixing, and Mie method were investigated with an offline radiation model for computationally efficient evaluation. Dark brown carbon was found to increase absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD) by up to 5.2 % in the simulation time and region. We derived a linear equation to estimate the correlation between modeled AAOD and columnar dark brown carbon (AAOD = 0.0023[D-BrC] + 0.0007) with core-shell considerations. Core-shell aerosol mixing and explicit Mie computation enhanced increases in AAOD from dark brown carbon at AERONET sites (up to 6.42 %). These results indicate that models omitting dark brown carbon may underestimate aerosol absorption in wildfire-influenced regions, and that including it, along with a realistic mixing state and Mie treatment, is important for estimating radiative forcing as wildfire activity increases.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Alexandra E. Ng, Manish Shrivastava, Brian Gaudet, Cenlin He, Zezhen Cheng, and William Vizuete

Status: open (until 18 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alexandra E. Ng, Manish Shrivastava, Brian Gaudet, Cenlin He, Zezhen Cheng, and William Vizuete
Alexandra E. Ng, Manish Shrivastava, Brian Gaudet, Cenlin He, Zezhen Cheng, and William Vizuete
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Wildfire smoke contains dark particles called tar balls that absorb sunlight and warm the air, but air quality and climate models usually leave them out. We added tar balls to a model of the southeastern United States and compared it with aircraft and ground measurements. Including them, and accounting for the coatings that form around them, raised the sunlight absorbed by smoke by up to 6 %. Models that omit tar balls may therefore underestimate warming from wildfires.
Share