the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
What controls tropospheric carbon monoxide in the remote Southern Hemisphere?
Abstract. The remote extratropical Southern Hemisphere (SH) has the cleanest atmosphere on Earth, but is subject to rapid changes regarding the emissions landscape and a warming climate, which strongly impact local atmospheric composition. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a product of methane (CH4) oxidation and a modulator of the tropospheric oxidizing capacity. In this study we investigate if the rapid increase in tropospheric CH4 levels of ∼7 % between 2008 and 2022 has driven a positive response in CO in the remote SH, based on multi-platform observations and a global chemistry transport model. We find inconsistencies in observations from aircraft, surface and satellite. CSIRO surface flask observations, AGAGE in-situ measurements (2008–2022) and airborne observations from the HIPPO (2009–2011) and ATom (2016–2018) campaigns show CO increases of 5–10 %. CO columns inferred from IASI (2014–2023) show more moderate increases of 3–4 % (statistically insignificant). NOAA surface flask observations and CO columns from MOPITT (2008–2022) do not show changes over time. GEOS-Chem simulations are consistent with the observed positive trend, exhibiting a significant CO increase of ∼7 % throughout the southern extratropical troposphere (2008–2022). These CO increases are partly driven by enhanced production from rising CH4 (∼50 %) and further affected by increases in biogenic non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) (∼45 %) and the direct effects of rising temperatures (∼5 %). We further explore how simulated CO levels in the remote SH could be impacted by future enhancements in primary and precursor emissions, changes in the oxidizing capacity, and temperature.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(3866 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2813 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Oct 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-5476', Domenico Taraborrelli, 16 Sep 2026
reply
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Domenico Taraborrelli, 16 Sep 2026
reply
Reference
Bergamaschi, P., R. Hein, C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer, and P. J. Crutzen (2000), Inverse modeling of the global CO cycle: 2. Inversion of 13C/12C and 18O/16O isotope ratios, J. Geophys. Res., 105(D2), 1929–1945, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900819
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5476-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Domenico Taraborrelli, 16 Sep 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 374 | 163 | 47 | 584 | 51 | 46 | 45 |
- HTML: 374
- PDF: 163
- XML: 47
- Total: 584
- Supplement: 51
- BibTeX: 46
- EndNote: 45
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The authors analyse and quantify the contribution of methane and BVOC oxidation to CO in the Southern Hemisphere. The key intermediate is HCHO whose sinks are said to be reaction with OH and photolysis. However, there are both evidence and understanding of other processes like reaction with HO2 (in the tropical UTLS) and cloud processing converting HCHO to formic acid. Are these processes accounted in the GEOS-Chem simulation analysed here? Is HCHO scavenged based only on physical solubility or also on its hydration and reaction with OH(aq)? The cloud processing of HCHO is consistent with the study by Bergamaschi et al. (2000) pointing to a likely CO-yield from methane oxidation being lower than 0.88 and potentially as low as 0.71. What is the simulated CO-yield for this model? Atmospheric models usually have a near-unity yield but there are exceptions. I would appreciate if the authors discussed this aspect in relation to the simulated 7% increase in CO during 2018-2022 in the southern extratropical troposphere.