Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5338
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5338
08 Oct 2026
 | 08 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

A typology of the temperature response in overshoot, peak and decline pathways

Norman Julius Steinert, Kirsten Zickfeld, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Charles D. Koven, Nadine Mengis, Pia Rethmeier, and Jörg Schwinger

Abstract. As the window to limiting global warming to 1.5 °C closes, mitigation pathways consistent with this limit increasingly rely on temporary temperature overshoot. Despite recent advances in understanding how the Earth system responds to climate overshoot, uncertainty remains about the extent to which overshoot-induced changes can be reversed. Here, we synthesize the key features that determine climate reversibility and the asymmetry between responses to positive and negative emissions, challenging assumptions that net-negative emissions can undo overshoot-induced changes. We propose a typology of temperature responses in overshoot, peak and decline pathways that goes beyond established notions of reversible and irreversible climatic changes, incorporating underexplored climate feedbacks that may arise specifically during negative-emission phases. On this basis, we argue that an irreversible response, as evident from current-generation climate model simulations, cannot be ruled out. A more nuanced characterization and quantification of overshoot dynamics is critical for assessing the feasibility and risks of overshoot-based climate mitigation strategies.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Earth System Dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Norman Julius Steinert, Kirsten Zickfeld, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Charles D. Koven, Nadine Mengis, Pia Rethmeier, and Jörg Schwinger

Status: open (until 19 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Norman Julius Steinert, Kirsten Zickfeld, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Charles D. Koven, Nadine Mengis, Pia Rethmeier, and Jörg Schwinger
Norman Julius Steinert, Kirsten Zickfeld, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, Charles D. Koven, Nadine Mengis, Pia Rethmeier, and Jörg Schwinger

Viewed

Total article views: 478 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
308 136 34 478 35 31
  • HTML: 308
  • PDF: 136
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 478
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 478 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 478 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
As 1.5°C pathways increasingly rely on temperature overshoot, this Perspective examines whether climate overshoot-induced effects can be reversed. We synthesize what drives climate reversibility in positive and negative emission pathways, proposing a typology of temperature responses beyond simple (ir)reversible categories. Current climate models suggest irreversible responses cannot be ruled out, underscoring the need for more nuanced assessment of overshoot-based mitigation risks.
Share