the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Integration of physics-informed deep learning with a distributed hydrological model (PIDL-DHM): A hybrid model for runoff simulation
Abstract. Climate change and vegetation restoration have altered hydrological processes, but quantifying vegetation-runoff interactions remains challenging due to complex feedback and data scarcity. We developed a physics-informed deep learning hybrid model that couples process-based hydrology with deep learning to improve runoff prediction in vegetation-altered basins. The model explicitly represents transpiration, interception, snow dynamics, dual runoff generation, water-balance constraints, and distributed spatial heterogeneity. Evaluations in three Chinese basins spanning hydroclimatic and vegetation gradients show that the hybrid models outperform pure deep learning, with the strongest improvements in semi-arid and vegetation-transition basins. Correlation coefficients exceeded 0.8 at monthly/annual scales and 0.75 at daily scales in the most responsive basins. Compared with GR4J, the added complexity is most beneficial in heterogeneous semi-arid and ungauged sub-basins. These results demonstrate that physical constraints improve extrapolation reliability and support hybrid models for sustainable basin management under climate change.
- Preprint
(3872 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Nov 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-5146 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 23 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Junping Wang, 24 Sep 2026
reply
Dear Prof. Añel,
Thank you very much for your comments and for clarifying the GMD Code and Data Policy. We sincerely appreciate your guidance and fully understand the importance of code and data accessibility for scientific reproducibility.
In response to your comments, we have updated our Zenodo repository to provide the PIDL-DHM source code, pretrained model parameters, and simulated runoff and evapotranspiration data. These materials are publicly available at:
https://zenodo.org/records/22928140
The meteorological forcing data used in this study were obtained from the publicly available China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD):
https://doi.org/10.11888/AtmosphericPhysics.tpe.249369.file
We would also like to clarify that the runoff observational data is subject to third-party data-sharing restrictions and cannot be publicly redistributed by the authors. We will revise the Code and Data Availability section of the manuscript accordingly.
We will revise the Code and Data Availability section accordingly and would be grateful for your consideration and guidance regarding the restricted observational data.
Thank you again for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Junping Wang
On behalf of all co-authors-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Sep 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, it does not solve the outstanding issues. We can not accept that you cite as source for your data the China Meteorological Forcing Dataset web page. Also, we can not accept your claims about problems with third-party distribution without adequate documentation that justify it.
Therefore, please, respond to this comment with a new text for the Code and Data availability section containing a citation to the acceptable repositories containing the requested data. Also,if you want that we study an exception to your obligation to share part of the data due to rules imposed on you, please, provide documentary evidence of the laws, rules or licenses that prevent you of sharing any data.
Therefore, the situation regarding your manuscript has not changed, and as it is right now, we can not consider your manuscript for publication or peer review in the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5146-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Sep 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Junping Wang, 24 Sep 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 267 | 110 | 38 | 415 | 36 | 29 |
- HTML: 267
- PDF: 110
- XML: 38
- Total: 415
- BibTeX: 36
- EndNote: 29
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
in the Code and Data Availability section of your manuscript you state "The datasets used in this study are subject to confidentiality restrictions and cannot be publicly shared." The policy of the journal makes clear that all the data used in a work submitted to the journal must be published openly and without restrictions at the submission time in a repository. In your comment you mention confidentiality issues; however, you do not provide evidence of them. Therefore, as it is, we can not continue considering your manuscript for Discussions and peer review in the journal, and in fact it should have not been accepted for it due the mentioned issues.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must insist that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor