High centennial-scale variability in an East Antarctic snow accumulation record spanning the last millennium
Abstract. Mass balance estimates of the East Antarctic ice sheet over the satellite era have a high degree of uncertainty, yet are of such significance that they can partially or even entirely offset the ice loss at the margins of the Antarctic Ice Sheet that contributes to global sea level rise. Therefore, it is imperative to improve our understanding of snowfall variability across time and space in East Antarctica. Here we present a new millennial-scale, annual snow accumulation history from the Mount Brown South (MBS) ice core, a semi-coastal record from 2,084 m elevation on the boundary of Wilhelm II and Princess Elizabeth Land in East Antarctica. We used a range of methods to test the best derivation of annual accumulation rates, and to ensure best practice in determining both density correction and layer thinning with depth. The MBS annual accumulation record spans 873–2017 CE, and displays a high degree of variability across time scales. The long-term mean snow accumulation rate at MBS is 0.276 ± 0.08 (1 standard deviation) m yr−1 ice equivalent, which is almost 10 % lower than the mean accumulation rate in the satellite era (1979–2017) of 0.302 ± 0.08 m yr−1 ice equivalent. While mean annual accumulation during the satellite era is within the range of natural variability, the full record exhibits substantial decadal to centennial-scale variability, including two notable low accumulation periods between CE 1127–1321 (195 years) and 1754–1879 (126 years), where accumulation was 12 % lower than the long-term mean, and 20 % lower than satellite era mean. While an ice core record is a point-based rather than spatially resolved estimate of annual accumulation, these results raise implications for future mass balance assessments in this region that assume the satellite era represents the natural range of variability.
Review of
High centennial-scale variability in an East Antarctic snow accumulation record spanning the last millennium
by Nilssen and others
General
The paper presents a new millennial-length annually-resolved snow accumulation record from Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. Such long accumulation time series data are valuable: they provide important long-term context for observed temporal surface accumulation variability based on (much) shorter time series from e.g. stakes, shallow firn cores and/or atmospheric models. The results presented in this study show significant regime shifts that appear to differ significantly from the (relatively) nearby deep ice core drilled at the coastal site Law Dome. Interesting information is also obtained from using two different ways to correct for strain induced layer thinning. The paper does lack some contextualization and remains a little bit thin on interpretation, so that sometimes it reads more like a data paper. But it is worth publishing as the new time series is important and the analysis robust. Furthermore, the paper is well written (pending some clarifications, see below) and the figures are of good quality. My comments are therefore relatively minor.
Major comments
When discussing the drill site, it would be nice to provide some climatological context, e.g. you could provide maps encompassing the same area as in Fig. 1 to present and briefly discuss annual average temperature, annual accumulation rate (from e.g. ERA5).
Maybe I missed it, but can you say something about the ice velocity at this site, i.e. how far the core site travelled horizontally over the period the accumulation record covers? Compared to the regional accumulation gradients, what does this advection imply for the consistency of the accumulation time series in the core (probably little, but good to state an estimate)?
Figure 2: Can you comment on the fact that the empirical fit appears to systematically overestimate density below a depth of ~150 m?
line 156: How sensitive are your results to the choice of l (here l = 50)?
Can you provide an estimate of the (relative) uncertainty in your ice core-derived annual accumulation values?
Minor and textual comments
The first sentence of the abstract is inconsistent. Please reformulate, e.g. consider replacing "ice loss at the margins of the Antarctic Ice Sheet" with "ice loss at the margins of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet". Or replace Mass balance" by "Surface mass balance"?
line 3: "snowfall variability" do you mean "snow accumulation variability"?
line 25: "Surface mass balance, which is dominated by snowfall variability" suggest "Surface mass balance variability, which is dominated by snowfall variability".
line 28: "Ice core records extend the climate record" suggest "Ice core records extend the record of direct accumulation observations". Because ice cores are part of the climate record.
line 61 and elsewhere: surface -> shallow (suggestion)
line 68: Please clarify "unconstrained" in this context.
line 147: Why "thus"?
line 274: snowfall accumulation records -> snowfall accumulation records derived from ice cores