Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4806
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4806
28 Sep 2026
 | 28 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Multimodel implementation of the Raven HBV-EC model for streamflow simulation and uncertainty quantification

Aida Jabbari, Biljana Music, David Huard, James Craig, Richard Turcotte, Mohammad Bizhanimanzar, Simon Lachance-Cloutier, Charles Malenfant, and François Anctil

Abstract. Despite advancements in hydrological modelling, quantifying inherent uncertainties in simulation and forecasting remains essential. These uncertainties arise from sources such as initial conditions, input data, parameter estimation, and model structure. While the hydrological community has increasingly focused on uncertainty assessment, most studies concentrate on input data and parameter uncertainty within specific models, leaving model structure uncertainty unexplored. This study introduces an ensemble-based approach to assess hydrological distributed model uncertainty, emphasizing model structure and input data uncertainties concurrently. The study leverages the Raven hydrological modelling framework to create an ensemble of hydrological model structures. This structural ensemble fed noise-perturbed forcing inputs to represent input data uncertainty. The forward greedy method aids in selecting a pool of models from the ensemble, enhancing reliability and reducing the model count. This method is employed to refine the model pool by ensuring that each criterion meets the predefined performance standards. The approach is demonstrated over the southwest portion of the Saint-Laurent watershed in Canada, evaluating model ensembles against observed streamflow. This study advances the understanding of hydrological model uncertainty assessment and emphasizes the significance of a comprehensive, multimodel approach that accounts for structural, input data, and calibration uncertainties for robust streamflow simulations and forecasts. The findings highlight how employing multimodel ensembles is crucial for minimizing different sources of uncertainty, as opposed to relying on a solitary model.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Aida Jabbari, Biljana Music, David Huard, James Craig, Richard Turcotte, Mohammad Bizhanimanzar, Simon Lachance-Cloutier, Charles Malenfant, and François Anctil

Status: open (until 23 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Aida Jabbari, Biljana Music, David Huard, James Craig, Richard Turcotte, Mohammad Bizhanimanzar, Simon Lachance-Cloutier, Charles Malenfant, and François Anctil
Aida Jabbari, Biljana Music, David Huard, James Craig, Richard Turcotte, Mohammad Bizhanimanzar, Simon Lachance-Cloutier, Charles Malenfant, and François Anctil
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 28 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Reliable streamflow predictions are important for managing water resources and preparing for floods. We developed and tested 48 versions of a hydrological model to explore how differences in model design and weather data affect predictions. We found that combining several models and accounting for uncertainty in weather data produced more reliable predictions while using fewer models. This approach can support more robust water management and flood forecasting.
Share