Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4610
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4610
05 Oct 2026
 | 05 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Wave-induced erosion and notch development at the Fimbul Ice Shelf front

Wenjun Lu, Lotte Wendt, Behnam Ghadimi, Shovon Jubair, Dominique Mouaze, Marianne Font, Rémi Lambert, Harvey Goodwin, Geir Moholdt, Raed Lubbad, and Sveinung Løset

Abstract. Ocean waves erode the waterline of Antarctic ice-shelf fronts and carve a thermo-erosional notch. The notch is hidden from satellites, yet it preconditions front collapse and footloose calving, so the link between notch growth and observable front retreat matters for how wave-exposed ice shelves lose mass. We study this link at the Fimbul Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, in January–February 2024. The widely used White et al. (1980) erosion formulation is extended in two directions: a component-wise spectral treatment of irregular seas, and a breaking-aware wave profile that accounts for shoaling over the submerged ice foot revealed by remotely operated vehicle (ROV) profiling. Forced with hourly ERA5 waves, the extended model predicts about 110 m of cumulative waterline erosion over the matched 7 January–27 February window. Satellite observations show considerably more retreat: about 264 m from an S1-guided Sentinel-2 plateau-break method, and 266 m from manually digitised Sentinel-1 fronts over a slightly longer window. Under the baseline assumptions (α = 1, ΔTwi = 1 °C), the model therefore falls short of the observed retreat by a factor of about 2.4. Part of this residual may be hydrodynamic, since post-breaking turbulence is not represented; part may be mechanical, because collapse and footloose calving can convert notch erosion into larger observable retreat. Unmeasured near-ice thermal driving remains a first-order uncertainty, and front-position observations alone cannot separate these contributions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Wenjun Lu, Lotte Wendt, Behnam Ghadimi, Shovon Jubair, Dominique Mouaze, Marianne Font, Rémi Lambert, Harvey Goodwin, Geir Moholdt, Raed Lubbad, and Sveinung Løset

Status: open (until 16 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Wenjun Lu, Lotte Wendt, Behnam Ghadimi, Shovon Jubair, Dominique Mouaze, Marianne Font, Rémi Lambert, Harvey Goodwin, Geir Moholdt, Raed Lubbad, and Sveinung Løset

Data sets

Ice-Shelf Wave Erosion - Fimbulisen Analysis Code (processed ice-front positions and derived retreat series) Wenjun Lu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21622437

Model code and software

Ice-Shelf Wave Erosion - Fimbulisen Analysis Code Wenjun Lu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21622437

Wenjun Lu, Lotte Wendt, Behnam Ghadimi, Shovon Jubair, Dominique Mouaze, Marianne Font, Rémi Lambert, Harvey Goodwin, Geir Moholdt, Raed Lubbad, and Sveinung Løset
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Ocean waves carve a notch into the waterline of Antarctic ice shelf fronts. The notch is hidden from satellites, yet it weakens the front and helps set how fast it retreats. At the Fimbul Ice Shelf we extend a standard wave-erosion formula to irregular and breaking waves and drive it with reanalysis waves for the 2024 austral summer. It predicts about 110 m of erosion, while satellites show about 265 m of retreat, so wave erosion alone does not explain the observed front retreat.
Share