Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-44
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-44
23 Jan 2026
 | 23 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Towards Constraining the Drivers of Variability and Trends in Subantarctic Productivity

Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie

Abstract. The subantarctic Southern Ocean is a climatically important region, where primary production largely drives the seasonal uptake of atmospheric CO2, contributing to the sequestration of anthropogenic carbon emissions. Seasonal iron and light limitation control annual net primary production (NPP) in this region, but the explicit mechanisms that drive interannual variability in NPP remain elusive due to sparse observations. This uncertainty is reflected in inconsistent interannual variability and trend estimates of remotely-sensed NPP algorithms. Without clear mechanistic underpinning, confidence in remotely-sensed NPP trends remains low and hinders predictive capability. To overcome observational limitations and better understand the drivers of interannual NPP variability, we analyse the explicit bottom-up and top-down controls of depth integrated NPP in a biogeochemical ocean model historical run (1958–2022) from the Indian sector of the subantarctic zone. The highest NPP years were primarily driven by increased relief of iron limitation, with iron supplied from both deeper mixing in winter/spring and enhanced remineralisation in summer. In spring, higher phytoplankton growth rates were decoupled from surface biomass, such that years with higher NPP were due to faster growth in the mixed layer. Faster growth rates emerged following deeper winter mixed layers, driving phytoplankton distributions deeper in winter and reducing mixed layer grazing loss rates in spring. This generated a predator-prey dynamic favouring surface biomass accumulation moving into summer. Thus, inconsistent remote-sensing NPP estimates may derive from how algorithms link biomass (rather than growth rates) to NPP. We applied our analysis to CMIP6 models, and while all historical simulations converged with respect to positive trends in NPP, bias from sea surface temperature trends influenced the mechanisms driving interannual NPP variability. These findings show that interacting top-down and bottom-up processes can decouple changes in NPP with respect to phytoplankton biomass, which has important implications for remote sensing NPP estimates based on biomass. Therefore, the need for cautionary approaches to NPP trend interpretation is highlighted, and that further observational data are needed to ground truth mechanistic understanding of NPP drivers.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie

Status: open (until 06 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie
Christopher D. Traill, Tyler W. Rohr, Elizabeth H. Shadwick, Pearse J. Buchanan, Alessandro Tagliabue, and Andrew R. Bowie
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Southern Ocean phytoplankton are a key part of the carbon cycle, yet year-to-year changes in ocean productivity are poorly understood. Using model simulations, this study shows how deeper mixing in the most productive years increases nutrient supply & changes the predator-prey relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton. This helps explain why satellite productivity estimates disagree, and the reasons for why climate projections might be getting inaccurate estimates of future production.
Share