Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4283
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4283
07 Sep 2026
 | 07 Sep 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Novel analogue-based and geostatistical approaches for space-time prediction of environmental variables

Loïc Gerber, Mathieu Gravey, and Grégoire Mariéthoz

Abstract. In many environmental applications, it is important to obtain accurate and coherent reconstructions of environmental maps. These can be for example spatial representations of hydrological variables or satellite-based remote sensing products. To do this, analogue-based methods provide a fast and interpretable approach that is based on replicating patterns coming from historical observations and predictor similarity. However, their classical weighted-average aggregation tends to smooth spatial variability and attenuate extremes. This study evaluates whether analogue-based reconstruction of MODIS evapotranspiration (ET) over the Ebro watershed can be improved through local analogue selection and stochastic pattern-based aggregation. Several strategies are compared, including domain-wise and tile-wise analogue selection, inverse-distance weighted averaging, and two Multiple-Point Statistics simulation techniques, chessQS and a new method named Anchor Sampling. Weighted averaging provides the best pixel-wise accuracy, image-structure agreement, and computational efficiency, while tile-wise analogue selection yields only marginal improvements over domain-wise selection. Anchor Sampling offers the most balanced stochastic option, improving variogram agreement, timestep water-balance error, and tail-value statistics while remaining closer to the deterministic baseline than chessQS. In contrast, chessQS increases spatial flexibility but reduces reconstruction accuracy and image-structure agreement in the present application. The results indicate that stochastic aggregation can help preserve aspects of spatial variability and distributions, but that simple analogue averaging remains a strong baseline for ET map reconstruction, unless the realism of the spatial structure or uncertainty representation are specifically required.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Loïc Gerber, Mathieu Gravey, and Grégoire Mariéthoz

Status: open (until 02 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Loïc Gerber, Mathieu Gravey, and Grégoire Mariéthoz

Data sets

Input files, comparison code, and selected results Loïc Gerber https://zenodo.org/records/21105051

Model code and software

Comparison code Loïc Gerber https://github.com/LoicGerber/stochastic-analogue-reconstruction

Loïc Gerber, Mathieu Gravey, and Grégoire Mariéthoz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
We tested whether environmental maps can be reconstructed better by selecting similar past situations locally and combining past maps in three ways, including simple averaging and two MPS-based stochastic methods. Each method has advantages: averaging was fastest and most accurate overall, while stochastic methods better preserved some spatial variability and high values. Overall, the simpler averaging approach remains the best baseline, but the preferred method depends on the goal.
Share